14 C.F.R. § 107.39
Operation over human beings
No person may operate a small unmanned aircraft over a human being unless—
(a) That human being is directly participating in the operation of the small unmanned aircraft;
(b) That human being is located under a covered structure or inside a stationary vehicle that can provide reasonable protection from a falling small unmanned aircraft; or
(c) The operation meets the requirements of at least one of the operational categories specified in subpart D of this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case (1 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund v. Davis & Son Excavation, L.L.C. d/b/a Davis Constr., LLC (N.D. Ill. 2021).
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund v. Davis & Son Excavation, L.L.C. d/b/a Davis Constr., LLC (N.D. Ill. 2021). “) Davis alleges that the drone footage must be excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence 402 because the Funds violated Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) regulation 14 C.F.R. § 107.39 in operating the 3 The Funds dispute that Exhibit No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.