14 C.F.R. § 161.3
Applicability
(a) This part applies to airports imposing restrictions on Stage 2 aircraft operations proposed after October 1, 1990, and to airports imposing restrictions on Stage 3 aircraft operations that became effective after October 1, 1990.
(b) This part also applies to airports enacting amendments to airport noise and access restrictions in effect on October 1, 1990, but amended after that date, where the amendment reduces or limits aircraft operations or affects aircraft safety.
(c) The notice, review, and approval requirements set forth in this part apply to all airports imposing noise or access restrictions as defined in § 161.5 of this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2016–2024 · leading case: Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc. v. Town of East Hampton, 841 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 2016).
Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc. v. Town of East Hampton, 841 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 2016). “” 14 C.F.R. § 161.3 (a), (c) (emphasis added).”
Palm Beach Cnty. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 53 F.4th 1318 (11th Cir. 2022). “” 14 C.F.R. § 161.3 (c); see also 49 U.S.C.”
Delux Pub. Charter, LLC v. Cnty. of Westchester, New York (S.D.N.Y. 2024). “§ 47524 (b), (c)(1), (d); 14 C.F.R. § 161.3 (a), (b). Local airport-use restrictions that pre-date ANCA’s passage are explicitly excluded from the strict “notice, review, and approval” requirements and are considered “grandfathered” under ANCA.”
Matter of East End Hangars, Inc. v. Town of E. Hampton, N.Y., 2024 NY Slip Op 01708 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024). “Contrary to the respondents/defendants' contentions, the procedural requirements of ANCA at issue here applied to the Town's determination to close the airport as a public use airport and reopen it a few days later as a private use airport ( see 49 USC § 47524 [a]-[c]; 14 CFR…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.