14 C.F.R. § 183.63

Continuing requirements: Products, parts or appliances

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

For any approval or certificate for a product, part or appliance issued under the authority of this subpart, an ODA Holder must:

(a) Monitor reported service problems related to certificates or approvals it holds;

(b) Notify the Administrator of:

(1) A condition in a product, part or appliance that could result in a finding of unsafe condition by the Administrator; or

(2) A product, part or appliance not meeting the applicable airworthiness requirements for which the ODA Holder has obtained or issued a certificate or approval.

(c) Investigate any suspected unsafe condition or finding of noncompliance with the airworthiness requirements for any product, part or appliance, as required by the Administrator, and report to the Administrator the results of the investigation and any action taken or proposed.

(d) Submit to the Administrator the information necessary to implement corrective action needed for safe operation of the product, part or appliance.

[Docket FAA-2003-16685, 70 FR 59947, Oct. 13, 2005, as amended by Amdt. 183-14, 76 FR 8893, Feb. 16, 2011]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Farrar v. Textron Aviation, Inc. (Kan. Ct. App. 2024).
Farrar v. Textron Aviation, Inc. (Kan. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 32× “The district court at first denied Textron's motion, finding there were genuine disputes of material fact about whether Textron had failed to notify the FAA about an allegedly defective seat locking mechanism as required under 14 C.F.R. § 183.63 (2016). Textron then filed what…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.