14 C.F.R. § 23.1529

Instructions for continued airworthiness

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The applicant must prepare Instructions for Continued Airworthiness, in accordance with appendix A of this part, that are acceptable to the Administrator. The instructions may be incomplete at type certification if a program exists to ensure their completion prior to delivery of the first airplane or issuance of a standard certificate of airworthiness, whichever occurs later.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2005–2024 · leading case: Schiewe v. Cessna Aircraft Co, 2024 OK 19 (Okla. 2024).
Schiewe v. Cessna Aircraft Co, 2024 OK 19 (Okla. 2024). · cites it 6× “14 C.F.R. § 23.1529. The mechanic who worked on the aircraft testified that Cessna had a regulatory duty under federal law to maintain and revise maintenance manuals for its aircraft in its capacity as manufacturer.”
Colgan Air, Inc. v. Raytheon Aircraft Co., 404 F. Supp. 2d 893 (E.D. Va. 2005). “See 14 C.F.R. § 23.1529 , Appx. G. This means that airworthiness is contingent on the operator’s demonstration that the aircraft has been maintained in accordance with the latest revision and changes to the manufacturer’s maintenance manual.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.