14 C.F.R. § 382.5

When are U.S. and foreign carriers required to begin complying with the provisions of this part?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

As a U.S. or foreign carrier, you are required to comply with the requirements of this part on May 13, 2009, except as otherwise provided in individual sections of this part.

Notes of Decisions
Elizabeth NEWMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Am. AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee, & Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Defendants, 176 F.3d 1128 (9th Cir. 1999). · cites it 2× “14 C.F.R. § 382.5 (c). Visual impairment, heart disease, and cancer are all physical impairments that may trigger protection under the ACAA.”
Richard A. Bower v. Fed. Express Corp., 96 F.3d 200 (6th Cir. 1996). “The regulatory definitions of some of the statutorily undefined terms in the ACAA are set out in 14 C.F.R. § 382.5 . A related regulation makes it clear that § 382.”
Adiutori v. Sky Harbor Int'l Airport, 880 F. Supp. 696 (D. Ariz. 1995). · cites it 3× “5 defines a major life activity in its definition of “handicapped individual” to include walking and the Court finds that the evidence of record establishes that the plaintiff’s difficulty in walking stemming from his debilitating arthritis 'of his knees fits that definition,…”
Waters v. Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey, 158 F. Supp. 2d 415 (D.N.J. 2001). “See 14 C.F.R. § 382.5 . Section 382.9 provides: Carriers’ contracts with contractors who provide services to passengers, including carriers’ agreements of appointment with travel agents .”
Price v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 5 F. Supp. 2d 226 (D. Vt. 1998). · cites it 2× “” 14 C.F.R. § 382.5 (a)(1). Major life activities include “functions such as caring for one’s self, performing manual tasks, walking .”
Glass v. Nw. Airlines, Inc., 761 F. Supp. 2d 734 (W.D. Tenn. 2011). · cites it 3× “” See 14 C.F.R. § 382.5 (2008); see also 14 C.F.”
Boswell v. SkyWest Airlines, Inc., 217 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (D. Utah 2002). “, 14 C.F.R. § 382.5 (ACAA definition of "air carrier'').”
Love v. Delta Air Lines, 179 F. Supp. 2d 1313 (M.D. Ala. 2001). “14 C.F.R. § 382.5 . Based on the foregoing, the court must determine whether Plaintiff was a “qualified individual with a disability” and whether she provided the required notice.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.