15 C.F.R. § 730.2
Statutory authority
The EAR have been designed primarily to implement the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, 50 U.S.C. app. 2401-2420 (EAA). There are numerous other legal authorities underlying the EAR. These are listed in the
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2010–2023 · leading case: Fed. Express Corp. v. U.S. Dep't of Com., 39 F.4th 756 (D.C. Cir. 2022).
Fed. Express Corp. v. U.S. Dep't of Com., 39 F.4th 756 (D.C. Cir. 2022). “See 15 C.F.R. § 730.2 . Before the 2018 Export Controls Act, Congress’s export administration laws were not permanent.”
Micei Int'l v. Dep't of Com., 613 F.3d 1147 (D.C. Cir. 2010). “See 15 C.F.R. § 730.2 (2009). Designed to regulate the export of dual-use items (goods with both commercial and military applications), see 50 U.”
United States v. Bryan Evan Singer, 963 F.3d 1144 (11th Cir. 2020). “See 15 C.F.R. § 730.2 . 4 Case: 18-14294 Date Filed: 06/26/2020 Page: 5 of 46 When the Export Administration Act lapsed in 2001, President George W.”
United States v. Peter Sotis, 89 F.4th 862 (11th Cir. 2023). “§§ 4601–23; 15 C.F.R. § 730.2 . These regulations are “intended to serve the na- tional security, foreign policy, nonproliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and other interests of the United States.”
Elec. Frontier Found. v. Dep't of Com., 58 F. Supp. 3d 1008 (N.D. Cal. 2013). “15 C.F.R. § 730.2 . Since August 20, 2001, the President has maintained the EAR in effect through a series of actions taken under the authority of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”), Pub.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.