C.F.R. » Title 15 » CHAPTER IX—NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE › SUBCHAPTER B—OCEAN AND COASTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT › PART 930—FEDERAL CONSISTENCY WITH APPROVED COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS › Subpart C—Consistency for Federal Agency Activities

15 C.F.R. § 930.44

Availability of mediation for disputes concerning proposed activities

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

In the event of a serious disagreement between a Federal agency and a State agency regarding the consistency of a proposed federal activity affecting any coastal use or resource, either party may request the Secretarial mediation or OCRM mediation services provided for in subpart G.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2002–2002 · leading case: California v. Norton, 311 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
California v. Norton, 311 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2002). “2 If a State determines that a proposed federal activity is not consistent with that State’s Coastal Management Program and the United States disagrees, the State may seek mediation of the dispute, 15 C.F.R. § 930.44 (1999), or may seek relief in federal court, see, e.”
Serrano-Lopez v. Cooper, 193 F. Supp. 2d 424 (D.P.R. 2002). “15 C.F.R. § 930.44 Note (2001). D. CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION On October 15, 2001 the Navy submitted an Application for Certification of Consistency with the Puerto Rico Coastal Management Program (“Application for Certification of Consistency”) to the PRPB to continue its…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.