C.F.R. » Title 16 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION › SUBCHAPTER A—ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURES AND RULES OF PRACTICE › PART 1—GENERAL PROCEDURES › Subpart B—Rules and Rulemaking Under Section 18(a)(1)(B) of the FTC Act

16 C.F.R. § 1.7

Scope of rules in this subpart

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The rules in this subpart apply to and govern proceedings for the promulgation of rules as provided in section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)). Such rules will be known as trade regulation rules. All other rulemaking proceedings will be governed by the rules in subpart C of this part, except as otherwise required by law or as otherwise specified in this chapter.

[86 FR 38547, July 22, 2021]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1965–2025 · leading case: Nat'l Auto. Assoc v. FTC, 127 F.4th 549 (5th Cir. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat'l Auto. Assoc v. FTC, 127 F.4th 549 (5th Cir. 2025). · cites it 3× “8 16 C.F.R. § 1.7 . 9 16 C.F.R. § 1.10 (a).”
Emile M. Lapeyre v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 366 F.2d 117 (5th Cir. 1966). · cites it 2× “2d 224 , where the question was decided adversely to the contention of the Commission, did on June 20, 1966, grant a rehearing en banc on this precise question.”
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Flotill Prods., Inc., 389 U.S. 179 (1967). “7, Procedures and Rules of Practice for the Federal Trade Commission, as amended, 16 CFR § 1.7 (1967) (now § 6 of Statement of Organization of the FTC, 32 Fed.”
The Atl. Refining Co., a Corp. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 344 F.2d 599 (6th Cir. 1965). “…be presented, 1 . “A majority of the members of the Commission constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business.” 16 C.F.R. 1.7.”
Flotill Prods., Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 358 F.2d 224 (9th Cir. 1966). · cites it 3× “and to a rule of the FTC, 16 C.F.R. § 1.7 . We do not consider this authority determinative.”
Ass'n of Nat'l Advertisers, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 617 F.2d 611 (D.C. Cir. 1979). · cites it 2× “§ 57a(e)(1)(B) (1976). . The Commission did not solicit comment on those of the 1975 rules that merely repeated the language of section 18 or that explained how a rulemaking might be initiated.”
Flotill Prods., Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 358 F.2d 224 (9th Cir. 1966). · cites it 3× “41, and to a rule of the FTC, 16 C.F.R. 1.7. We do not consider this authority determinative.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.