C.F.R. » Title 16 » CHAPTER II—CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION › SUBCHAPTER B—CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY ACT REGULATIONS › PART 1119—CIVIL PENALTY FACTORS

16 C.F.R. § 1119.1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part sets forth the Consumer Product Safety Commission's (Commission) interpretation of the statutory factors considered in determining the amount of civil penalties that the Commission may seek or compromise. The policies behind, and purposes of, civil penalties include the following: Deterring violations; providing just punishment; promoting respect for the law; promoting full compliance with the law; reflecting the seriousness of the violation; and protecting the public.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2019–2019 · leading case: United States v. Spectrum Brands, Inc., 924 F.3d 337 (7th Cir. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Spectrum Brands, Inc., 924 F.3d 337 (7th Cir. 2019). “The court also concluded that the government had established a reasonable likelihood of future violations warranting a permanent injunction requiring Spectrum to reform its internal compliance programs and procedures.”
United States v. Spectrum Brands, Inc. (7th Cir. 2019). “§ 2069 (b); 16 C.F.R. §§ 1119.1 , 1119.4; R. 234 at 5–12, the district court issued a decision imposing both fines and a permanent injunction.”
United States v. Spectrum Brands, Inc. (7th Cir. 2019). “§ 2069 (b); 16 C.F.R. §§ 1119.1 , 1119.4; R. 234 at 5–12, the district court issued a decision imposing both fines and a permanent injunction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.