16 C.F.R. § 23.20

Misuse of the word “pearl.”

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) It is unfair or deceptive to use the unqualified word “pearl” or any other word or phrase of like meaning to describe, identify, or refer to any object or product that is not in fact a pearl, as defined in § 23.19(a).

(b) It is unfair or deceptive to use the word “pearl” to describe, identify, or refer to a cultured pearl unless it is immediately preceded, with equal conspicuousness, by the word “cultured” or “cultivated,” or by some other word or phrase of like meaning, so as to indicate definitely and clearly that the product is not a pearl.

(c) It is unfair or deceptive to use the word “pearl” to describe, identify, or refer to an imitation pearl unless it is immediately preceded, with equal conspicuousness, by the word “artificial,” “imitation,” or “simulated,” or by some other word or phrase of like meaning, so as to indicate definitely and clearly that the product is not a pearl.

(d) It is unfair or deceptive to use the terms “faux pearl,” “fashion pearl,” “Mother of Pearl,” or any other such term to describe or qualify an imitation pearl product unless it is immediately preceded, with equal conspicuousness, by the word “artificial,” “imitation,” or “simulated,” or by some other word or phrase of like meaning, so as to indicate definitely and clearly that the product is not a pearl.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1979–1979 · leading case: In Re IBM Peripheral EDP Devices, Etc., 481 F. Supp. 965 (N.D. Cal. 1979).
In Re IBM Peripheral EDP Devices, Etc., 481 F. Supp. 965 (N.D. Cal. 1979). “, 16 C.F.R. Section 23.20 (Jewelry Industry) and 16 C.”
Transamerica Comput. Co. v. Int'l Bus. Machines Corp., 481 F. Supp. 965 (N.D. Cal. 1979). “, 16 C.F.R. Section 23.20 (Jewelry Industry) and 16 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.