(a) When initial decision is required. The Administrative Law Judge shall make an initial decision in any proceeding in which a hearing is required to be conducted in conformity with the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, as codified, 5 U.S.C. 557. He shall make an initial decision in other proceedings in which the Commission directs him to make such a decision.
(b) Filing of initial decision. After the parties have been afforded an opportunity to file their proposed findings of fact, proposed conclusions of law and supporting briefs pursuant to § 10.82, the Administrative Law Judge shall prepare upon the basis of the record in the proceeding and shall file with the Proceedings Clerk his or her decision, a copy of which shall be served by the Proceedings Clerk upon each of the parties.
(c) Effect of initial decision. The initial decision shall become the decision of the Commission 30 days after service thereof, except:
(1) The decision shall not become final as to any party who shall have filed a notice of appeal pursuant to § 10.102 of these rules; and
(2) The decision shall not become final as to any party to the proceeding if, within 30 days after the initial decision and order, the Commission itself shall have placed the case on its own docket for review or stayed the effective date of the decision.
In the event that the initial decision becomes the final decision of the Commission with respect to a party, that party shall be duly notified thereof by the Proceedings Clerk. The notice shall state that the time for filing a notice of appeal by the party has expired, that the Commission has determined not to review the initial decision on its own initiative and shall specify the date on which a final order in the proceeding shall become effective as against that party.
[41 FR 2511, Jan. 16, 1976, as amended at 60 FR 54802, Oct. 26, 1995; 61 FR 21954, May 13, 1996; 63 FR 55794, Oct. 19, 1998]
Notes of Decisions
Steven C. Brenner & Jami Weisner Brenner v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, 338 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2003).
“See 17 C.F.R. § 10.84 (c) (2003). Second, Brenner and Weisner argue that when the ALJ granted the Division’s motion for clarification on April 17th, it mooted the previously filed notices of appeal, necessitating the fifing of new notices — if a party still wished to pursue an…”
Myron v. Chicoine, 678 F.2d 727 (7th Cir. 1982).
“§ 18 (b), an administrative law judge (ALJ) conducted a hearing on the complaint and issued an initial decision as required by 17 C.F.R. § 10.84 . The initial decision 1 consisted of detailed factual findings and a general conclusion that Rosenthal, through its agent, had…”
Brenner, Steven C. v. CFTR (7th Cir. 2003).
“See 17 C.F.R. § 10.84 (c) (2003). Second, Brenner and Weisner argue that when the ALJ granted the Division’s motion for clarification on April 17th, it mooted the previously filed notices of appeal, necessitat- ing the filing of new notices—if a party still wished to pursue an…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.