C.F.R. » Title 18 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY › SUBCHAPTER L—REGULATIONS FOR FEDERAL POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS › PART 301—AVERAGE SYSTEM COST METHODOLOGY FOR SALES FROM UTILITIES TO BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION UNDER NORTHWEST POWER ACT

18 C.F.R. § 301.1

Applicability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The regulations in this part apply to the sales of electric power by any Utility to the Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville) under section 5(c) of the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act (Northwest Power Act). 16 U.S.C. 839c(c).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1986–2007 · leading case: Portland Gen. Elec. Co. v. Bonneville Power Admin., 501 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Portland Gen. Elec. Co. v. Bonneville Power Admin., 501 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2007). · cites it 4× “See 18 C.F.R. § 301.1 . We have characterized the 1984 methodology as the “‘crucial part of the agreement’ between BPA and the IOUs participating in the [REP].”
Washington Utils. & Transp. Comm'n v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 26 F.3d 935 (9th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2× “See generally Average System Cost Methodology, 18 C.F.R. § 301.1 (1991). At its simplest, the ASC equals the utility’s “contract system costs” divided by its “contract system load.”
Pac. Power & Light Co. v. Bonneville Power Admin., 795 F.2d 810 (9th Cir. 1986). “5, 1984), revising 18 C.F.R. § 301.1 (1984). FERC denied a petition for rehearing on the merits.”
Portland Gen. v. Bpa (9th Cir. 2007). · cites it 5× “See 18 C.F.R. § 301.1 . We have characterized the 1984 methodology as the “ ‘crucial part of the agreement’ between BPA and the IOUs participating in the [REP].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.