18 C.F.R. § 35.27

Authority of State commissions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in this part—

(a) Shall be construed as preempting or affecting any jurisdiction a State commission or other State authority may have under applicable State and Federal law, or

(b) Limits the authority of a State commission in accordance with State and Federal law to establish

(1) Competitive procedures for the acquisition of electric energy, including demand-side management, purchased at wholesale, or

(2) Non-discriminatory fees for the distribution of such electric energy to retail consumers for purposes established in accordance with State law.

[Order 697, 72 FR 40038, July 20, 2007]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–1990 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Nantahala Power & Light Co., 388 S.E.2d 118 (N.C. 1990).
State Ex Rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Nantahala Power & Light Co., 388 S.E.2d 118 (N.C. 1990). “Conservation of Power, Water Resources, 18 C.F.R. § 35.27 (1989). This Notice and the Order applied only to electric utilities even though the TRA-86 applied uniformly to all utilities.”
Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 860 F.2d 1097 (D.C. Cir. 1988). · cites it 2× “ith a record supporting the application of a consistent policy treating changes in tax liability per se as warranting dollar-for-dollar spot adjustments in established rates without review of other cost-of-service components, and for that reason we decline to speculate on its…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.