19 C.F.R. § 111.22
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1980–2002 · leading case: United States v. Katherine J. Segall, A/k/a: Katherine J. Coady, 833 F.2d 144 (9th Cir. 1987).
United States v. Katherine J. Segall, A/k/a: Katherine J. Coady, 833 F.2d 144 (9th Cir. 1987). “, 19 C.F.R. § 111.22 -.25 (1986). She requested two or three weeks to prepare her records and an accounting for Cementos.”
Lee v. United States, 196 F. Supp. 2d 1351 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2002). “§ 1641 (d)(1)(C)); for failure to maintain records in the prescribed format (a violation of 19 C.F.R. § 111.22 ); for failure to timely provide employee information (a violation of 19 C.”
United States v. Klingler, 827 F. Supp. 1287 (E.D. Mich. 1993). “Not only must specific information be provided pursuant to these regulations, but a standard format for recording financial transactions is prescribed in 19 C.F.R. § 111.22 (d). The regulations also require that the customs broker make the records available to the Customs…”
United States v. McCoy, 492 F. Supp. 540 (M.D. Fla. 1980). “Other records which must be maintained are described in 19 C.F.R. § 111.22 (1978). Furthermore, customs records must be available for inspection, copying, reproduction or other official use.”
Kazangian v. Brady, 15 Ct. Int'l Trade 488 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1991). “Charges IV and V allege violations of 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.22 and 111.23, which provide, in part, that the broker “shall keep current a record of all his Customs transactions in the format set forth in paragraph (d) of this section, unless an exemption has been granted” ( 19 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.