C.F.R. » Title 19 » CHAPTER I—U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY › PART 152—CLASSIFICATION AND APPRAISEMENT OF MERCHANDISE › Subpart A—General Provisions

19 C.F.R. § 152.2

Notification to importer of increased duties

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

If the Center director believes that the entered rate or value of any merchandise is too low, or if he finds that the quantity imported exceeds the entered quantity, and the estimated aggregate of the increase in duties on that entry exceeds $15, he shall promptly notify the importer on Customs Form 29, or its electronic equivalent specifying the nature of the difference on the notice. Liquidation shall be made promptly and shall not be withheld for a period of more than 20 days from the date of mailing of such notice unless in the judgment of the Center director there are compelling reasons that would warrant such action.

[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17477, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 82-224, 47 FR 53728, Nov. 29, 1982; T.D. 93-66, 58 FR 44131, Aug. 19, 1993; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61291, Oct. 13, 2015]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1988–2015 · leading case: Am. Nat'l Fire Ins. v. United States, 441 F. Supp. 2d 1275 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Am. Nat'l Fire Ins. v. United States, 441 F. Supp. 2d 1275 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). · cites it 2× “19 C.F.R. § 152.2 states that notification to importers of increased duties shall be sent using Customs Form 29 and reads in pertinent part: If the port director believes that the entered rate or value of any merchandise is too low .”
Am. Fiber & Finishing, Inc. v. United States, 2015 CIT 117 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2015). “A CF-29 notice, of action is issued pursuant to 19 C.F.R, § 152.2 (providing that "[i]f the port director believes that the entered rate or value of any merchandise is too low, or if he finds that the quantity imported exceeds the entered quantity, and the estimated aggregate of…”
Int'l Custom Prods., Inc. v. United States, 748 F.3d 1182 (Fed. Cir. 2014). “” 19 C.F.R. § 152.2 . This provision shows only that notices of action are intended to serve as entry-specific notifications.”
Milin Indus., Inc. v. United States, 691 F. Supp. 1454 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1988). “Defendant counters plaintiff’s claims that Customs violated its own regulations by stating that 19 C.F.R. §§ 152.2 and 152.3 only apply where Customs makes a pro-testable classification or appraisement decision, and there was no liquidation of “the towels in the shipment”…”
All Tools, Inc. v. United States, 2010 CIT 114 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2010). “5; see 19 C.F.R. § 152.2 . Neither Mr. Carmona nor All Tools responded to the Notice of Action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.