19 C.F.R. § 207.30

Comment on information

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In any final phase of an investigation under section 705 or section 735 of the Act, the Commission shall specify a date on which it will disclose to all parties to the investigation all information it has obtained on which the parties have not previously had an opportunity to comment. Any such information that is business proprietary information will be released to persons authorized to obtain such information pursuant to § 207.7. The date on which disclosure is made will occur after the filing of posthearing briefs pursuant to § 207.25.

(b) The parties shall have an opportunity to file comments on any information disclosed to them after they have filed their posthearing brief pursuant to § 207.25. Comments shall only concern such information, and shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages of textual material. A comment may address the accuracy, reliability, or probative value of such information by reference to information elsewhere in the record, in which case the comment shall identify where in the record such information is found. Comments containing new factual information shall be disregarded. The date on which such comments must be filed will be specified by the Commission when it specifies the time that information will be disclosed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section. The record shall close on the date such comments are due, except with respect to investigations subject to the provisions of section 771(7)(G)(iii) of the Act, and with respect to changes in bracketing of business proprietary information in the comments permitted by § 207.3(c).

[61 FR 37833, July 22, 1996, as amended at 76 FR 61943, Oct. 6, 2011; 79 FR 35925, June 25, 2014; 90 FR 236, Jan. 3, 2025]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 2000–2017 · leading case: Sichuan Changhong Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United States, 466 F. Supp. 2d 1323 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Sichuan Changhong Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United States, 466 F. Supp. 2d 1323 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). · cites it 6× “19 C.F.R. § 207.30 (b) (2004). Changhong submitted ten pages of comments, of which one and one-quarter pages discussed the updated financial information.”

Consol. Fibers, Inc. v. United States, 574 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2008). · cites it 3× “§ 1677m(g) and 19 C.F.R. § 207.30 (b). See Def.’s Mem. at 15-16.”

Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United States, 116 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2000). “29 [now 19 C.F.R. § 207.30 (2000)], the Commission may adopt a practice of releasing staff reports on or before the disclosure date established pursuant to that section in the event that one or more parties to an investigation or review do not have access to business proprietary…”

ITG Voma Corp. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 253 F. Supp. 3d 1339 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017). “; see also 19 C.F.R. § 207.30 (regulatory provision implementing statutory mandate).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.