C.F.R. » Title 2 » CHAPTER I—OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GOVERNMENT-WIDE GUIDANCE FOR FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE › PART 180—OMB GUIDELINES TO AGENCIES ON GOVERNMENT-WIDE DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION (NONPROCUREMENT) › Subpart H—Debarment

2 C.F.R. § 180.850

What is the standard of proof in a debarment action?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In any debarment action, the Federal agency must establish the cause for debarment by a preponderance of the evidence.

(b) If the proposed debarment is based upon a conviction or civil judgment, the standard of proof is met.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Gordon v. Roberson (D. Me. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gordon v. Roberson (D. Me. 2023). · cites it 2× “Because a conviction satisfies an agency’s burden, an agency acts logically and reasonably in awaiting the result of criminal proceedings before initiating a debarment action. Furthermore, if the agency commenced the debarment action during the pendency of the criminal…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.