C.F.R. » Title 2 » CHAPTER II—OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GUIDANCE › PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS › Subpart D—Post Federal Award Requirements

2 C.F.R. § 200.302

Financial management

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Each State must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with State laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the State's funds. All recipient and subrecipient financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by the terms and conditions; and tracking expenditures to establish that funds have been used in accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. See § 200.450.

(b) The recipient's and subrecipient's financial management system must provide for the following (see §§ 200.334, 200.335, 200.336, and 200.337):

(1) Identification of all Federal awards received and expended and the Federal programs under which they were received. Federal program and Federal award identification must include, as applicable, the Assistance Listings title and number, Federal award identification number, year the Federal award was issued, and name of the Federal agency or pass-through entity.

(2) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each Federal award or program in accordance with the reporting requirements in §§ 200.328 and 200.329. When a Federal agency or pass-through entity requires reporting on an accrual basis from a recipient or subrecipient that maintains its records other than on an accrual basis, the recipient or subrecipient must not be required to establish an accrual accounting system. This recipient or subrecipient may develop accrual data for its reports based on an analysis of the documentation on hand.

(3) Maintaining records that sufficiently identify the amount, source, and expenditure of Federal funds for Federal awards. These records must contain information necessary to identify Federal awards, authorizations, financial obligations, unobligated balances, as well as assets, expenditures, income, and interest. All records must be supported by source documentation.

(4) Effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets. The recipient or subrecipient must safeguard all assets and ensure they are used solely for authorized purposes. See § 200.303.

(5) Comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each Federal award.

(6) Written procedures to implement the requirements of § 200.305.

(7) Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with subpart E and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2016–2024 · leading case: United States of Am. v. Fpolisolutions, LLC (W.D. Pa. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States of Am. v. Fpolisolutions, LLC (W.D. Pa. 2021). · cites it 3× “To obtain each award or contract, FPoli certified to DOE that its financial management system met the standards set forth in 2 C.F.R § 200.302, requiring the ability to trace all funds “to a level of expenditures adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to…”
United States of Am. v. Magee Womens Rsch. Inst. & Found. (W.D. Pa. 2024). · cites it 2× “As relevant here, NIH grant recipients: (1) must have adequate financial management and internal controls systems, as stated in 2 C.F.R. § 200.302 and 45 C.F.R. § 75.302 (ECF 90, ¶¶ 93-96); (2) must not mismanage funds by improperly transferring costs to federal grants ( ¶¶…”
Untitled Texas Attorney Gen. Opinion (Tex. Att'y Gen. 2016). “" 2 C.F.R. § 200.302 (a). Subsection 404.094(a) of the Government Code provides that "grants, donations, and other funds collected or received by a state agency under law shall be deposited in the treasury, credited to a special fund or funds, and subject to appropriation only…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.