C.F.R. » Title 2 » CHAPTER II—OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GUIDANCE › PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS › Subpart D—Post Federal Award Requirements

2 C.F.R. § 200.342

Opportunities to object, hearings, and appeals

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Federal agency must maintain written procedures for processing objections, hearings, and appeals. Upon initiating a remedy for noncompliance (for example, disallowed costs, a corrective action plan, or termination), the Federal agency must provide the recipient with an opportunity to object and provide information challenging the action. The Federal agency or pass-through entity must comply with any requirements for hearings, appeals, or other administrative proceedings to which the recipient or subrecipient is entitled under any statute or regulation applicable to the action involved.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2023–2025 · leading case: Louisiana Delta Serv. Corps v. Corp. for Nat'l & Cmty. Serv., No. 3:25-cv-00378 (M.D. La. June 27, 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Louisiana Delta Serv. Corps v. Corp. for Nat'l & Cmty. Serv., No. 3:25-cv-00378 (M.D. La. June 27, 2025). · cites it 5× “) In Count V, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants failed “to specify all termination provisions in the terms and conditions and bypassed the appeal process[]” in violation of the Uniform Guidance, 2 C.F.R. § 200.342 . (Id. at ¶ 18.) In Count VI, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants…”
Power Forward Communities, Inc. v. Citibank, N.A., No. 2025-0762 (D.D.C. Mar. 18, 2025). · cites it 3× “]” Under 2 C.F.R. § 200.342 , titled, ‘Opportunities to object, hearings, and appeals,’ “[u]pon initiating a remedy for noncompliance”—such as termination—“the Federal agency must provide the recipient with an opportunity to object and provide information challenging the action.”
Power Forward Communities, Inc. v. Citibank, N.A., No. 2025-0762 (D.D.C. Mar. 18, 2025). · cites it 3× “]” Under 2 C.F.R. § 200.342 , titled, ‘Opportunities to object, hearings, and appeals,’ “[u]pon initiating a remedy for noncompliance”—such as termination—“the Federal agency must provide the recipient with an opportunity to object and provide information challenging the action.”
Porwancher v. Nat'l Endowment for the Humanities, No. 2025-1180 (D.D.C. July 25, 2025). · cites it 2× “2 C.F.R. § 200.342 . It told him there was no such process.”
Partners in Nutrition d/b/a Partners in Quality Care Appeal of MDE Decision Child & Adult Care Food Prog. December ..., 995 N.W.2d 631 (Minn. Ct. App. 2023). “” 2 C.F.R. § 200.342 . In terminating Partners’s food-program agreement, MDE relied on two provisions of the OMB regulations that provide general authority for the suspension and termination of federal awards.”
Vera Inst. of Just. v. U.S. Dep't of Just., No. 2025-1643, 2025 WL 1865160 (D.D.C. July 7, 2025). “Consistent with 2 C.F.R. § 200.342 , grant recipients had 30 days to submit a written appeal to the Assistant Attorney General for OJP.”
Shapiro, No. 1:25-cv-00998 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2025). “Redding also asked that USDA provide its written procedures for processing objections, hearings, and appeals, as required under 2 C.F.R. § 200.342 , or to inform PDA that no such procedures existed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.