(a) General rule. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section and in §§ 404.630 through 404.633 which relate to the filing date of an application, an application for benefits, or a written statement, request, or notice is filed on the day it is received by an SSA employee at one of our offices or by an SSA employee who is authorized to receive it at a place other than one of our offices.
(b) Other places and dates of filing. We will also accept as the date of filing—
(1) The date an application for benefits, or a written statement, request or notice is received by any office of the U.S. Foreign Service or by the Veterans Administration Regional Office in the Philippines;
(2) The date an application for benefits or a written statement, request or notice is mailed to us by the U.S. mail, if using the date we receive it would result in the loss or lessening of rights. The date shown by a U.S. postmark will be used as the date of mailing. If the postmark is unreadable, or there is no postmark, we will consider other evidence of when you mailed it to us; or
(3) The date an application for benefits is filed with the Railroad Retirement Board or the Veterans Administration. See § 404.611 (b) and (c) for an explanation of when an application for benefits filed with the Railroad Retirement Board or the Veterans Administration is considered an application for social security benefits.
[44 FR 37209, June 26, 1979, as amended at 59 FR 44923, Aug. 31, 1994]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
67
cases (
29 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case:
Rogers v. Lee, 777 S.E.2d 402 (S.C. Ct. App. 2015).
Rogers v. Lee, 777 S.E.2d 402 (S.C. Ct. App. 2015).
“315 (2015); 20 C.F.R. § 404.614 (2015), but the claimant "may obtain a [judicial] review of [the] decision by a civil action .”
Miller v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 280 F. App'x 870 (11th Cir. 2008).
“20 C.F.R. § 404.614 . Where an applicant submits a written statement, such as a letter, indicating his intent to claim benefits, the date that the written statement is received will be considered the claimant’s filing date if: (1) the statement indicates an intent to claim…”
Howard v. Apfel, 17 F. Supp. 2d 955 (W.D. Mo. 1998).
“20 C.F.R. § 404.614 states in pertinent part as follows: (a) General rule.”
Slocum v. Saul (D. Alaska 2019).
· cites it 2× “See 20 C.F.R. § 404.614 . 84 Garrison v. Colvin, 759 F.”
Cranmer v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin. (D. Or. 2020).
· cites it 2× “Thus, the new regulations eliminate the term “treating source,” as well as what is customarily known as the treating source or treating physician rule.”
Sutton (D. Alaska 2025).
· cites it 2× “See 20 C.F.R. § 404.614 . 67 See SSA POMS DI 24503.”
Rick Johnson v. Kilolo Kijakazi (9th Cir. 2022).
“; 20 C.F.R § 404.614(a). Similarly, the Program Operations Manual System (POMS) states the “filing date” is the earlier of the date of either a valid application received or the protective filing.”
— 20 C.F.R. § 404.614(a) — 1 case
Rick Johnson v. Kilolo Kijakazi (9th Cir. 2022).
“; 20 C.F.R § 404.614(a). Similarly, the Program Operations Manual System (POMS) states the “filing date” is the earlier of the date of either a valid application received or the protective filing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.