20 C.F.R. § 404.907

Reconsideration—general

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

If you are dissatisfied with the initial determination, reconsideration is the first step in the administrative review process that we provide, except that we provide the opportunity for a hearing before an administrative law judge as the first step for those situations described in §§ 404.930 (a)(6) and (a)(7), where you appeal an initial determination denying your request for waiver of adjustment or recovery of an overpayment (see § 404.506). If you are dissatisfied with our reconsidered determination, you may request a hearing before an administrative law judge.

[61 FR 56132, Oct. 31, 1996]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 43 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1970–2026 · leading case: Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976).
Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976). · cites it 2× “20 CFR §§ 404.907 , 404.909 (1975). [20] Upon acceptance by the SSA, benefits are terminated effective two months after the month in which medical recovery is found to have occurred.”
Stieberger v. Heckler, 615 F. Supp. 1315 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). · cites it 2× “20 C.F.R. § 404.907 (1982).7 (7 If the initial determination is that the disability has ceased due to medical reasons, and the claimant has a right to a hearing on the same issue in connection with a claim for SSI, the claimant need not request reconsideration, but may request a…”
Robert George Drummond & Mildred Pauline Drummond v. Fulton Cnty. Dep't of Fam. & Child.'s Servs., 563 F.2d 1200 (5th Cir. 1977). “20 CFR §§ 404.907 , 404.909 (1975). Upon acceptance by the SSA, benefits are terminated effective two months after the month in which medical recovery is found to have occurred.”
Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Comp. Bureau, 273 N.W.2d 692 (N.D. 1978). “20 CFR §§ 404.907 , 404.909 (1975). Upon acceptance by the SSA, benefits are terminated effective two months after the month in which medical recovery is found to have occurred.”
Arlene M. Mattern v. F. David Mathews, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 582 F.2d 248 (3rd Cir. 1978). “hich set forth the reasons for the proposed recoupment, the availability of reconsideration of the determination of overpayment, the conditions for “waiver” under section 204(b), and the need to consult with a local Administration office within thirty days if the recipient feels…”
Escalera v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 457 F. App'x 4 (2d Cir. 2011). “20 C.F.R. §§ 404.907 , 404.909(a)(1). The reconsideration determination is binding unless a claimant requests a hearing before an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) within 60 days of receiving notice of the reconsideration determination.”
Cost v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 770 F. Supp. 2d 45 (D.D.C. 2011). “The reconsideration determination is binding unless a claimant requests a hearing before an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) within sixty days of receiving notice of the reconsideration determination. 2 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.”
In re Ryan W., 76 A.3d 1049 (Md. 2013). “20 C.F.R. § 404.907 . The SSA provides written notice to all parties of its reconsidered determination, and that decision is appealable to an administrative law judge (“ALJ”).”
Rowan v. Morgan (In Re Rowan), 15 B.R. 834 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1981). “20 C.F.R. Section 404.907. Following the reconsideration, the individual has a right to a hearing conducted by an administrative law judge appointed by the Associate Commissioner for Hearings and Appeals or his delegate.”
William A. Atteberry v. Robert H. Finch, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 424 F.2d 36 (10th Cir. 1970). · cites it 2× “20 C.F.R. § 404.907 provides: “Notice of initial determination.”
Adams v. Califano, 474 F. Supp. 974 (D. Maryland 1979). “20 C.F.R. §§ 404.907 , 416.1404. A disability claimant who is dissatisfied with the initial decision may request reconsideration.”
Pallotta v. Comm Soc. Sec., 144 F. App'x 938 (3rd Cir. 2005). “See 20 C.F.R. § 404.907 As the petition was unsuccessful, he sought an evidentiary hearing before an ALJ.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.