C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND DISABLED › Subpart K—Income

20 C.F.R. § 416.1101

Definition of terms

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this subpart—

Calendar quarter means a period of three full calendar months beginning with January, April, July, or October.

Child means someone who is not married, is not the head of a household, and is either under age 18 or is under age 22 and a student. (See § 416.1856)

Couple means an eligible individual and his or her eligible spouse.

Current market value means the price of an item on the open market in your locality.

Federal benefit rate means the monthly payment rate for an eligible individual or couple. It is the figure from which we subtract countable income to find out how much your Federal SSI benefit should be. The Federal benefit rate does not include the rate for any State supplement paid by us on behalf of a State.

Institution means an establishment which makes available some treatment or services beyond food and shelter to four or more persons who are not related to the proprietor. (See § 416.201)

Spouse means someone who lives with another person as that person's husband or wife. (See § 416.1806)

We, Us, or Our means the Social Security Administration.

You or Your means a person who is applying for, or already receiving, SSI benefits.

[45 FR 65547, Oct. 3, 1980, as amended at 50 FR 48573, Nov. 26, 1985; 51 FR 10616, Mar. 28, 1986; 60 FR 16375, Mar. 30, 1995]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1977–2024 · leading case: Dorothy Ellison, Etc. v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Etc., 546 F.2d 1162 (5th Cir. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dorothy Ellison, Etc. v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Etc., 546 F.2d 1162 (5th Cir. 1977). “The District Court had jurisdiction over plaintiff’s constitutional claim pursuant to 405(g). The judgment of the District Court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
Ruppert v. Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 671 F. Supp. 151 (E.D.N.Y 1987). “1061 (a) (1981); 20 C.F.R. § 416.1101 (1987). 35 Mary Ruppert turned twenty on March 26, 1980 and was not married at the time in question.”
Ford v. Shalala, 87 F. Supp. 2d 163 (E.D.N.Y 1999). “” 20 C.F.R. § 416.1101 . SSA selects one of three methods to compute the value of in-kind income depending on the claimant’s living arrangements.”
Jorge Florez, on Behalf of Raul Wallace, Ss Unh-Ek-Whsm v. John J. Callahan, Acting Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 156 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 1998). “” 20 C.F.R. § 416.1101 (1997) (emphasis added).”
Carol G. Ellis v. Kenneth Apfel, Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 147 F.3d 139 (2d Cir. 1998). “1130 (b) (hereinafter, the "Jackson regulation”) ("In the ... Seventh Circuit .”
Herweg v. Ray, 619 F.2d 1265 (8th Cir. 1980). “§ 1382a(l)(2)(B); 20 C.F.R. § 416.1101 (a) (income in general), .”
Ragsdale v. Apfel, 999 F. Supp. 814 (E.D. Va. 1998). “§ 1382a(b)(2)(A)-(B); 20 C.F.R. § 416.1101 (1997). Countable income encompasses earned and unearned income, the latter consisting of support and maintenance furnished both in cash and in kind.”
G.C. v. Div. of Med. Assistance & Health Servs. (084417) (Statewide) (N.J. 2021). “[ 20 C.F.R. § 416.1101 .] 26 regulation states “we subtract only your own countable income from the Federal benefit rate for an individual to determine whether you are eligible for SSI benefits.”
Pamela Kay Humphries v. Robert Brian Buchanan (Va. Ct. App. 2024). “” 20 C.F.R. § 416.1101 . On its face, this exclusion does not apply to support payments in situations, like N.”
Tennyson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin. (D. Ariz. 2024). “”); see also 20 C.F.R. § 416.1101 . 5 Here, Plaintiff applied for SSI on April 20, 2017.”
Randall v. Califano, 500 F. Supp. 691 (N.D. Cal. 1980). · cites it 2× “§§ 1382 -1382b; 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.1101 et seq., and 416.1201 et seq.”
— 20 C.F.R. § 416.1101(a) — 1 case
Dorothy Ellison, Etc. v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Etc., 546 F.2d 1162 (5th Cir. 1977). “The District Court had jurisdiction over plaintiff’s constitutional claim pursuant to 405(g). The judgment of the District Court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.