20 C.F.R. § 422.201

Material included in this subpart

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart describes in general the procedures relating to hearings, review by the Appeals Council of the hearing decision or dismissal, and court review in cases decided under the procedures in parts 404, 408, 410, and 416 of this chapter. It also describes the procedures for requesting a hearing or Appeals Council review, and for instituting a civil action for court review of cases decided under these parts. For detailed provisions relating to hearings, review by the Appeals Council, and court review, see the following references as appropriate to the matter involved:

(a) Title II of the Act, §§ 404.929 through 404.983 of this chapter;

(b) Title VIII of the Act, §§ 408.1040 through 408.1060 of this chapter;

(d) Part B of title IV of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 as amended, §§ 410.630 through 410.670.

[41 FR 53791, Dec. 9, 1976, as amended at 44 FR 34942, June 18, 1979; 54 FR 4268, Jan. 30, 1989; 71 FR 16462, Mar. 31, 2006; 76 FR 24812, May 3, 2011; 85 FR 73161, Nov. 16, 2020]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1973–2022 · leading case: Jose R. E. Martinez v. Elliot L. Richardson, Individually and as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Jose R. E. Martinez v. Elliot L. Richardson, Individually and as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health (1973) ca10 “20 C.F.R. § 422.201 et seq. for Part A; 20 C.”

Cartwright v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (2021) nysd “§ 405 (g), nor 20 C.F.R. § 422.201 (c), supports the position that, in the event the presumptive five [sic] day for receipt is a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday, the sixty-day limitation period begins to run on the next business day.”

Ruiz v. Kijakazi (2022) waed “19 29 See 20 C.F.R. § 422.201 . 20 30 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g).”

Swift Eagle v. Kijakazi (2022) waed “19 28 See 20 C.F.R. § 422.201 . 20 29 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g).”

Greenspan v. Blue Cross Blue Shield (1977) nyed “§ 1395ff, 20 C.F.R. § 422.201 . Sufficient facts must be pled to indicate that this avenue has been followed.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.