C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER V—EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › PART 650—STANDARD FOR APPEALS PROMPTNESS—UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION

20 C.F.R. § 650.2

Federal law requirements

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Section 303(a)(1) of the Social Security Act requires that a State law include provision for:

Such methods of administration * * * as are found by the Secretary of Labor to be reasonably calculated to insure full payment of unemployment compensation when due.

(b) Section 303(a)(3) of the Social Security Act requires that a State law include provision for:

Opportunity for a fair hearing, before an impartial tribunal, for all individuals whose claims for unemployment compensation are denied.

(c) Section 303(b)(2) of the Social Security Act provides that:

Whenever the Secretary of Labor, after reasonable notice and opportunity for hearing to the State agency charged with the administration of the State law, finds that in the administration of the law there is—

(1) * * *

(2) A failure to comply substantially with any provision specified in subsection (a) [303(a)]; the Secretary of Labor shall notify such State agency that further payments will not be made to the State until he is satisfied that there is no longer any such denial or failure to comply. Until the Secretary of Labor is so satisfied, he shall make no further certification to the Secretary of the Treasury with respect to such State * * *

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1977–1979 · leading case: Graves v. Meystrik, 425 F. Supp. 40 (E.D. Mo. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Graves v. Meystrik, 425 F. Supp. 40 (E.D. Mo. 1977). “The federal standard for appeals promptness is set out at 20 C.F.R., sections 650.2, 650.3, and 650.”
Wilkinson v. Abrams, 473 F. Supp. 246 (E.D. Pa. 1979). “§ 503 (b)(2); 20 C.F.R. § 650.2 (c). With this statutory mandate as a basis, 5 the regulations provide that state law must include provision for “such methods of administration of the appeals process as will reasonably assure hearing and decision with *249 the greatest…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.