C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER VI—OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › SUBCHAPTER B—FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969, AS AMENDED › PART 725—CLAIMS FOR BENEFITS UNDER PART C OF TITLE IV OF THE FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT, AS AMENDED › Subpart B—Persons Entitled to Benefits, Conditions, and Duration of Entitlement

20 C.F.R. § 725.207

Determination of dependency; divorced spouse

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

For the purpose of augmenting benefits, an individual who is the miner's divorced spouse (§ 725.206) will be determined to be dependent upon the miner if:

(a) The individual is receiving at least one-half of his or her support from the miner (see § 725.233(g)); or

(b) The individual is receiving substantial contributions from the miner pursuant to a written agreement (see § 725.233(c) and (f)); or

(c) A court order requires the miner to furnish substantial contributions to the individual's support (see § 725.233(c) and (e)).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1983–1992 · leading case: Irene Taylor v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 967 F.2d 961 (4th Cir. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Irene Taylor v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 967 F.2d 961 (4th Cir. 1992). · cites it 5× “§ 902 (a); 20 C.F.R. § 725.207 (1991). The support must take the form of regular contributions actually provided by the miner from his or her property or credit.”
Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor v. Orpha Hill (86-3906), Jenna L. Holmes (86-3925), 831 F.2d 635 (6th Cir. 1987). · cites it 2× “See also 20 C.F.R. § 725.207 . The definitions of “one-half support” and “contributions” for the purposes of a “divorced wife” are the same as the definitions for “surviving divorced wife” discussed above.”
Zirkle v. Zirkle, 304 S.E.2d 664 (W. Va. 1983). “In addition, 20 C.F.R. § 725.207 provides: For the purpose of augmenting benefits, an individual who is the miner’s divorced spouse (§ 725.”
Virginia Ensinger v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 833 F.2d 678 (7th Cir. 1987). · cites it 2× “20 C.F.R. § 725.207 ; see also 30 U.S.C. § 902 (a)(2).”
Blevins v. Blevins, 300 S.E.2d 743 (Va. 1983). “351 (1982); 20 C.F.R. § 725.207 (1982). 2 *22 Mr. Blevins does not contend that Mrs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.