C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER VI—OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › SUBCHAPTER B—FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969, AS AMENDED › PART 725—CLAIMS FOR BENEFITS UNDER PART C OF TITLE IV OF THE FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT, AS AMENDED › Subpart F—Hearings

20 C.F.R. § 725.450

Right to a hearing

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Any party to a claim (see § 725.360) shall have a right to a hearing concerning any contested issue of fact or law unresolved by the district director. There shall be no right to a hearing until the processing and adjudication of the claim by the district director has been completed. There shall be no right to a hearing in a claim with respect to which a determination of the claim made by the district director has become final and effective in accordance with this part.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1989–2017 · leading case: Frontier-Kemper Constructors, Inc. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 876 F.3d 683 (4th Cir. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Frontier-Kemper Constructors, Inc. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 876 F.3d 683 (4th Cir. 2017). “See 20 C.F.R. § 725.450 ,725.481. B. During the 1970s, Frontier Constructors and Kemper Construction formed a partnership (the “Partnership”) that worked on heavy construction projects in the mining industry.”
Salvadore Plesh v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 71 F.3d 103 (3d Cir. 1995). “20 C.F.R. § 725.450 . The Director also relies on section 725.”
Ragon Cunningham v. Island Creek Coal Co. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 144 F.3d 388 (6th Cir. 1998). “” 20 C.F.R. § 725.450 . The Benefits Review Board cites a number of its own eases to support the ALJ’s decision not to hold a requested hearing.”
Pyro Mining Co. v. Slaton, 879 F.2d 187 (6th Cir. 1989). “” 20 C.F.R. § 725.450 (1988). In addition, Section 725.”
B & S Coal Co. & Old Repub. Ins. Co. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 35 F.3d 1041 (6th Cir. 1994). “” 20 C.F.R. § 725.450 (1988). In addition, Section 725.”
Lukman v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 896 F.2d 1248 (10th Cir. 1990). “” 20 C.F.R. § 725.450 (1989) (emphasis added).”
Johnson v. Royal Coal Co., 326 F.3d 421 (4th Cir. 2003). · cites it 2× “They also identify 20 C.F.R. § 725.450 (2002) and § 725.455(a) (2002) as in conflict with OALJ Rule 20.”
Frontier-Kemper Constructors v. DOWCP (4th Cir. 2017). “See 20 C.F.R. § 725.450 , 725.481. B. During the 1970s, Frontier Constructors and Kemper Construction formed a partnership (the “Partnership”) that worked on heavy construction projects in the mining industry.”
Tolliver v. DOWCP (4th Cir. 1999). · cites it 2× “" 20 C.F.R. § 725.450 . In the instant case, for example, the District Director had to compute the benefits to be paid to Tolliver, which he did on July 14, 1994.”
Indian Mountain v. DOWCP (4th Cir. 1998). “See 20 C.F.R. §§ 725.450 - 725.483 (1997). Thus, the Secretary created an administrative scheme for employer actions to recover overpayments which essentially mirrors the scheme applicable to recoupment actions brought by the Director on behalf of the Fund, except that she…”
Plesh v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs (3d Cir. 1995). “20 C.F.R. § 725.450 . The Director also relies on section 725.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.