C.F.R.
»
Title 20
» CHAPTER VI—OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › SUBCHAPTER B—FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969, AS AMENDED › PART 725—CLAIMS FOR BENEFITS UNDER PART C OF TITLE IV OF THE FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT, AS AMENDED › Subpart F—Hearings
(a) A decision and order shall become effective when filed in the office of the district director (see § 725.478), and unless proceedings for suspension or setting aside of such order are instituted within 30 days of such filing, the order shall become final at the expiration of the 30th day after such filing (see § 725.481).
(b) Any party may, within 30 days after the filing of a decision and order under § 725.478, request a reconsideration of such decision and order by the administrative law judge. The procedures to be followed in the reconsideration of a decision and order shall be determined by the administrative law judge.
(c) The time for appeal to the Benefits Review Board shall be suspended during the consideration of a request for reconsideration. After the administrative law judge has issued and filed a denial of the request for reconsideration, or a revised decision and order in accordance with this part, any dissatisfied party shall have 30 days within which to institute proceedings to set aside the decision and order on reconsideration.
(d) Regardless of any defect in service, actual receipt of the decision is sufficient to commence the 30-day period for requesting reconsideration or appealing the decision.
Notes of Decisions
K & R Contractors, LLC v. Michael Keene, 86 F.4th 135 (4th Cir. 2023).
· cites it 2× “§ 557 (b); 20 C.F.R. § 725.479 . Any party dissatisfied with the ALJ’s ruling may appeal to the Benefits Review Board.”
Westmoreland Coal Co. v. Sharpe Ex Rel. Sharpe, 692 F.3d 317 (4th Cir. 2012).
· cites it 2× “SHARPE pneumoconiosis must be rejected for the reasons delineated in the 2009 BRB Decision: Under [ 20 C.F.R. § 725.479 (entitled "Finality of decisions and orders")], filing a request for modifica- tion is not identified as a procedure that affects the finality of a Decision…”
Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Milliken, 200 F.3d 942 (6th Cir. 1999).
· cites it 2× “We also cannot accept Y&O’s argument that allowing the ALJ to rethink his conclusions renders either the regulation governing ALJ reconsideration, 20 C.F.R. § 725.479 (b), or the regulation governing duplicate black lung claims, 20 C.”
Nowlin v. E. Associated Coal Corp., 331 F. Supp. 2d 465 (N.D.W. Va. 2004).
“8 20 C.F.R. § 725.479 (a), the provision governing the effectiveness and finality of ALJ decisions provides: “(a) A decision and order shall become effective when filed in the office of the district director .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.