21 C.F.R. § 1305.03

Distributions requiring a Form 222 or a digitally signed electronic order

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Either a DEA Form 222 or its electronic equivalent as set forth in subpart C of this part and Part 1311 of this chapter is required for each distribution of a Schedule I or II controlled substance except for the following:

(a) Distributions to persons exempted from registration under Part 1301 of this chapter.

(b) Exports from the United States that conform with the requirements of the Act.

(c) Deliveries to a registered analytical laboratory or its agent approved by DEA.

(d) Delivery from a central fill pharmacy, as defined in § 1300.01 of this chapter, to a retail pharmacy.

(e) Deliveries to an authorized DEA registrant by an ultimate user, a long-term care facility on behalf of an ultimate user who resides or has resided at that facility, or a person authorized to dispose of the ultimate user decedent's property.

(f) Distributions to reverse distributors and distributors by collectors and law enforcement pursuant to § 1317.55 of this chapter.

(g) Deliveries of controlled substances from ultimate users for the purpose of recalls pursuant to § 1317.85 of this chapter.

[70 FR 16911, Apr. 1, 2005, as amended at 77 FR 4235, Jan. 27, 2012; 79 FR 53564, Sept. 9, 2014]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1980–2019 · leading case: Williamson v. Dist. of Columbia Bd. of Dentistry, 647 A.2d 389 (D.C. 1994).
Williamson v. Dist. of Columbia Bd. of Dentistry, 647 A.2d 389 (D.C. 1994). · cites it 2× “14(a)(25), 21 C.F.R. §§ 1305.03 , 1305.13 (1993). 9 After a two day hearing on this matter, the Board, on December 12, 1992, sustained all four charges, revoked petitioner’s license and imposed several conditions on reinstatement including a five year minimum period of…”
State v. Udin, 419 A.2d 251 (R.I. 1980). “§ 828 ; 21 C.F.R. §§ 1305.03 . A purchaser must submit copy 1 and copy 2 of the order form to the supplier and retain copy 3 in his own files.”
United States v. Greene (N.D. Ga. 2019). · cites it 4× “§ 827 (a)(3); 21 C.F.R. §§ 1305.03 , 1305.13. For the forms he did have that covered the relevant timeframe, Dr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.