21 C.F.R. § 182.3739

Sodium bisulfite

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Product. Sodium bisulfite.

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Limitations, restrictions, or explanation. This substance is generally recognized as safe when used in accordance with good manufacturing practice, except that it is not used in meats; in food recognized as a source of vitamin B1; on fruits or vegetables intended to be served raw to consumers or sold raw to consumers, or to be presented to the consumer as fresh.

[42 FR 14640, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 51 FR 25025, July 9, 1986; 55 FR 9832, Mar. 15, 1990; 59 FR 65939, Dec. 22, 1994]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1988–2008 · leading case: Iacangelo v. Georgetown Univ., 580 F. Supp. 2d 111 (D.D.C. 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Iacangelo v. Georgetown Univ., 580 F. Supp. 2d 111 (D.D.C. 2008). · cites it 2× “In interpreting 21 C.F.R. § 182.3739 9 , the Allen court held that “[t]he FDA stated in adopting the sulfite regulations that ‘addressing the potential hazards to sulfite-sensitive individuals’ was its primary concern and that ‘the purpose of this regulation is to respond to a…”

Allen v. Delchamps, Inc., 624 So. 2d 1065 (Ala. 1993). “21 C.F.R. § 182.3739 . See 21 U.S.C. § 331 (b), 342 (a)(2)(C), 348 (prohibiting "[t]he adulteration or misbranding of any food, drug, device, or cosmetic in interstate commerce" and stating that "[a] food shall be deemed adulterated .”

McPike v. Enciso's Cocina Mejicana, Inc., 762 P.2d 315 (Or. Ct. App. 1988). “073; 21 CFR §§ 182.3739 , 182.3766, 182.3798, 182.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.