22 C.F.R. § 53.1
Passport requirement; definitions
(a) It is unlawful for a citizen of the United States, unless excepted under 22 CFR 53.2, to enter or depart, or attempt to enter or depart, the United States, without a valid U.S. passport.
(b) For purposes of this part “United States” means “United States” as defined in section 215(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1185(c)).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1955–2008 · leading case: Eudene Eunique, an Individual v. Colin L. Powell, the Sec'y of State for the United States, 302 F.3d 971 (9th Cir. 2002).
Eudene Eunique, an Individual v. Colin L. Powell, the Sec'y of State for the United States, 302 F.3d 971 (9th Cir. 2002). “§ 1185 (b) (1997), 22 C.F.R. § 53.1 (2001), but the President may specify exceptions, 8 U.”
Max Shachtman v. John Foster Dulles, Individually & as Sec'y of State, 225 F.2d 938 (D.C. Cir. 1955). “915; see 22 CFR § 53.1 (1949). No exception bas been created for Europe.”
Walter Briehl v. John Foster Dulles, Sec'y of State, 248 F.2d 561 (D.C. Cir. 1957). “22 C.F.R. § 53.1 (1949). . Supra note 44.”
Eunique v. Powell, 281 F.3d 940 (9th Cir. 2002). “§ 1185 (b) (1997), 22 C.F.R. § 53.1 (2001), but the President may specify exceptions, 8 U.”
Charles O. Porter v. Christian A. Herter, Individually & as Sec'y of State, 278 F.2d 280 (D.C. Cir. 1960). “489 (1953) and 22 C.F.R. §§ 53.1 -.7 (1958), 67 Stat. c.”
United States v. Laub, 253 F. Supp. 433 (E.D.N.Y 1966). “§ 1185 (b) and the regulations thereunder, 22 CFR 53.1 through 53.9. It is not clear from a reading of the trial judge’s opinion denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment, 241 F.”
Untitled Texas Attorney Gen. Opinion (Tex. Att'y Gen. 2008). “2007); Passport Requirement and Exceptions, 22 C.F.R. § 53.1 (a) (2007). Exceptions to the passport requirement for United States citizens, contained in the Department of State regulations, currently provide that a United States citizen may enter and depart the United States…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.