C.F.R. » Title 24 » CHAPTER II—OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR HOUSING—FEDERAL HOUSING COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL › PART 200—INTRODUCTION TO FHA PROGRAMS

24 C.F.R. § 200.1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part sets forth requirements that are applicable to several of the programs of the Federal Housing Administration, an organizational unit within the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Program requirements applicable to FHA programs and other HUD programs also can be found in 24 CFR part 5. The specific program regulations should be consulted to determine which requirements in this part 200 or 24 CFR part 5 are applicable.

[61 FR 14398, Apr. 1, 1996]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1958–2007 · leading case: Cienega Gardens v. United States, 503 F.3d 1266 (Fed. Cir. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cienega Gardens v. United States, 503 F.3d 1266 (Fed. Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “See 24 C.F.R. §§ 200.1 , 200.2 (1994). [2] LIHPRHA provided that owners could immediately prepay (without offering the properties for sale) with HUD approval.”
Cienega Gardens v. United States, 194 F.3d 1231 (Fed. Cir. 1998). “See 24 C.F.R. §§ 200.1 , 200.2 (1994). . The original Owners that filed suit were Cienega Gardens, Cedar Gardens, Claremont Village Commons, Covina West Apartments, Del Amo Gardens, Del Vista Village, DeSoto Gardens, Independence Park Apartments, Kit-tridge Gardens I, Kittridge…”
Greenbrier (Lake Cnty. Trust Co. No. 1391) v. United States, 40 Fed. Cl. 689 (Fed. Cl. 1998). “24 C.F.R. §§ 200.1 , 200.40 (1978). In 1965, the Commissioner’s functions were assumed by the Secretary of HUD.”
Cienega Gardens v. United States, 162 F.3d 1123 (Fed. Cir. 1998). “See 24 C.F.R. §§ 200.1 , 200.2 (1994). . The original Owners that filed suit were Ciene-ga Gardens, Cedar Gardens, Claremont Village Commons, Covina West Apartments, Del Amo Gardens, Del Vista Village, DeSoto Gardens, Independence Park Apartments, Kittridge Gardens I, Kittridge…”
Cienega Gardens v. United States, 194 F.3d 1231 (Fed. Cir. 1998). “See 24 C.F.R. 200.1, 200.2 (1994). 3 The original Owners that filed suit were Cienega Gardens, Cedar Gardens, Claremont Village Commons, Covina West Apartments, Del Amo Gardens, Del Vista Village, DeSoto Gardens, Independence Park Apartments, Kittridge Gardens I, Kittridge…”
United States v. First Nat'l City Bank, 235 F. Supp. 894 (S.D.N.Y. 1964). “§§ 1702-1703 and regulations promulgated thereunder, 24 C.F.R. § 200.1 et seq. (1962). The facts have been stipulated in the Pre-trial Order and additional facts are contained in the Rule 9(g) statements filed by the parties.”
United States v. First Nat'l City Bank of New York, 353 F.2d 308 (1st Cir. 1965). “, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, 24 C.F.R. § 200.1 , et seq. The Bank appeals from Judge Bonsai’s award of summary judgment in favor of the government.”
United States v. Bland, 159 F. Supp. 395 (D. Md. 1958). “Pursuant to that act, the Commissioner has issued regulations which are codified in 24 C.F.R. 200.1 to 201.16. Under those regulations the financial institution, which is referred to as the insured, holds a contract of insurance and “will be reimbursed for its losses on loans…”
Corby Homes Ltd. P'ship v. United States, 38 Fed. Cl. 204 (Fed. Cl. 1997). “Plaintiffs include Corby Homes Limited Partnership, Hickory Creek Limited Partnership, Northway Manor Limited Partnership, Pin Oak Manor, Inc., Village Apartments Limited Partnership, Western Manor, Inc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.