C.F.R. » Title 24 » CHAPTER II—OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR HOUSING—FEDERAL HOUSING COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT › SUBCHAPTER B—MORTGAGE AND LOAN INSURANCE PROGRAMS UNDER NATIONAL HOUSING ACT AND OTHER AUTHORITIES › PART 207—MULTIFAMILY HOUSING MORTGAGE INSURANCE › Subpart B—Contract Rights and Obligations

24 C.F.R. § 207.254

Changes in premiums; manner of publication

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Notice of future premium changes will be published in the Federal Register. The Department will propose MIP changes for multifamily mortgage insurance programs and provide a 30-day public comment period for the purpose of accepting comments on whether the proposed changes are appropriate. After the comments have been considered, the Department will publish a final notice announcing the premiums for each program and their effective date. The provisions of paragraph (g) of 24 CFR 207.252 shall apply to any notice of future premium changes published pursuant to this section.

[66 FR 35073, July 2, 2001]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1975–1998 · leading case: Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United States, 161 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United States, 161 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 1998). · cites it 2× “See 24 C.F.R. § 207.254 (a). The effect of such an “initial endorsement” is that HUD, the Developer, and the lender “shall be bound by the provisions of [24 C.”
Diamond v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 493 (Ct. Cl. 1981). · cites it 2× “24 C.F.R. § 207.254 (a) (1973). A second and "final” endorsement takes place when the project is completed and the final total insurable mortgage amount can be determined.”
Lurline Gardens Ltd. Hous. P'ship v. United States, 37 Fed. Cl. 415 (Fed. Cl. 1997). · cites it 3× “252 (1971, 1973) (incorporating by reference 24 C.F.R. § 207.254 (1971, 1973)). However, the Commissioner’s final endorsement of the deeds and mortgage notes (when all advances had been made and all terms and conditions of the commitment had been complied with) did not occur…”
Greenbrier (Lake Cnty. Trust Co. No. 1391) v. United States, 40 Fed. Cl. 689 (Fed. Cl. 1998). “See 24 C.F.R. § 207.254 (a) (1978). . There were three principal documents executed to effect the transactions at issue in this case: (1) a deed of trust note; (2) a rider to the deed of trust note containing the prepayment term; (3) and a regulatory agreement.”
Manhattan Sav. Bank v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 599 (Ct. Cl. 1977). “251 (g) defines "mortgagee” to include "the original lender * * * and such of its assigns as are approved by the Commissioner,” and since 24 C.F.R. § 207.254 (c) obliges a mortgagee (and thus an assignee) to be bound by ali the mortgage insurance regulations, it must follow that…”
Trans-Bay Engineers & Builders, Inc. v. Lynn, 396 F. Supp. 265 (D.D.C. 1975). “” 24 C.F.R. § 207.254 (b). The building loan agreement itself does not mention final closing but does state, “The balance [of mortgage proceeds] due the Borrower hereunder shall be payable at such time after completion as the commissioner authorizes the release of the holdback.”
S.S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. East Harlem Pilot Block—Bldg. 1 Hous. Dev. Fund Co., 608 F.2d 28 (2d Cir. 1979). “This contractual provision is a regulation, 24 C.F.R. § 221.512 , applicable to § 236 projects by virtue of 24 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.