24 C.F.R. § 30.70

Prepenalty notice

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Prior to determining whether to issue a complaint under § 30.85, the official designated in subpart B of this part, or his or her designee (or the chairperson of the Mortgagee Review Board, or his or her designee, in actions under § 30.35), shall issue a written notice to the respondent. This prepenalty notice shall include the following:

(1) That HUD is considering seeking a civil money penalty;

(2) The specific violations alleged;

(3) The maximum civil money penalty that may be imposed;

(4) The opportunity to reply in writing to the designated program official within 30 days after receipt of the notice;

(5) That failure to respond within the 30-day period may result in issuance of a complaint under § 30.85 without consideration of any information that the respondent may wish to provide; and

(6) That if a complaint is issued under § 30.85, the respondent may request a hearing before an administrative law judge in accordance with § 30.95.

(b) Obligation to preserve documents. Upon receipt of the prepenalty notice, the respondent is required to preserve and maintain all documents or data, including electronically stored data, within his or her possession or control that may relate to the violations alleged in the prepenalty notice. The Department shall also preserve such documents or data upon the issuance of the prepenalty notice.

[74 FR 2751, Jan. 15, 2009]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: PF Sunset Plaza, LLC v. HUD, 60 F.4th 692 (D.C. Cir. 2023).
PF Sunset Plaza, LLC v. HUD, 60 F.4th 692 (D.C. Cir. 2023). · cites it 2× “24 C.F.R. § 30.70 (a). Then, once the time to respond to the pre-penalty notice has elapsed, and if HUD decides to seek a penalty, HUD issues a complaint, which it must serve on the property owner, now respondent, and simultaneously file with the Appeals Office.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.