24 C.F.R. § 50.21
Aggregation
Activities which are geographically related and are logical parts of a composite of contemplated HUD projects shall be evaluated together.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1982–1990 · leading case: Wicker Park Historic Dist. Pres. Fund v. Pierce, 565 F. Supp. 1066 (N.D. Ill. 1982).
Wicker Park Historic Dist. Pres. Fund v. Pierce, 565 F. Supp. 1066 (N.D. Ill. 1982). “24 C.F.R. 50.21. A Normal Environmental Clearance (“NEC”) “is essentially a consistency check with HUD environmental policies and standards and includes a brief evaluation of environmental impact.”
D'Agnillo v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 738 F. Supp. 1443 (S.D.N.Y. 1990). “24 CFR § 50.21 (a). The HUD regulations also provide that an EIS shall be prepared for, inter alia, a proposal “which would result in the construction or installation of 2,500 or more housing units, or which would provide sites for 2,500 or more housing units.”
D'Agnillo v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 738 F. Supp. 1454 (S.D.N.Y. 1990). “” The HUD regulation applicable to these particular housing units is 24 C.F.R. § 50.21 (a), which provides in part: Individual actions which are geographically related and are logical parts of a *1459 composite of contemplated actions shall be evaluated together.”
City of Loveland v. Pierce, 564 F. Supp. 76 (S.D. Ohio 1983). “” 24 C.F.R. § 50.21 . Pursuant to its regulations, the Loveland Pines proposal was reviewed through the application of a Normal Clearance.”
— 24 C.F.R. § 50.21(j) — 1 case
Wicker Park Historic Dist. Pres. Fund v. Pierce, 565 F. Supp. 1066 (N.D. Ill. 1982). “24 C.F.R. 50.21. A Normal Environmental Clearance (“NEC”) “is essentially a consistency check with HUD environmental policies and standards and includes a brief evaluation of environmental impact.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.