25 C.F.R. § 11.100
Where are Courts of Indian Offenses established?
(a) A list of the areas in Indian Country where Courts of Indian Offenses are established is available on the Bureau of Indian Affairs website (www.bia.gov) and is published periodically in the
(b) The Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, will maintain on the Bureau of Indian Affairs website (www.bia.gov) an updated list of the areas in Indian Country where Courts of Indian Offenses are established and, upon any change to the list, will publish notice of the change in the
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Comanche Nation v. Fox, 128 S.W.3d 745 (Tex. App. 2004).
Comanche Nation v. Fox, 128 S.W.3d 745 (Tex. App. 2004). “577, 587-89 (2000); see 25 C.F.R. §§ 11.100 et seq. (2003). They were established in the late nineteenth century as part of the BIA's policy to assimilate the Indians into mainstream American society.”
Gary C'hair & Rochelle C'hair v. Dist. Court of the Ninth Jud. Dist., State of Wyoming, & John Strohecker, 2015 WY 116 (Wyo. 2015). “See 25 C.F.R. § 11.100 . A Court of Indian Offenses operates only in those areas where a tribal court has not been established.”
Turner Ex Rel. Kiowa Tribe v. McGee, 681 F.3d 1215 (10th Cir. 2012). “The Court of Indian Offenses is created and empowered by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to 25 C.F.R. § 11.100 et seq. See Tillett v.”
Calvello v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, 1998 SD 107 (S.D. 1998). “We make this assumption because the Yankton Sioux Tribe is no longer listed under 25 C.F.R. § 11.100 (a). See Whiteco Metrocom v.”
Whiteco Metrocom Div. of Whiteco Indus., Inc. v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, 902 F. Supp. 199 (D.S.D. 1995). “has received a valid tribal enactment identifying the effective date of the code’s implementation, and the name of the tribe has been deleted from the listing of Courts of Indian Offenses under § 11.”
Michael Minnis & Assocs., P.C. v. Kaw Nation, 2004 OK CIV APP 36 (Okla. Civ. App. 2003). “25 C.F.R. §§ 11.100 ; see Tillett v. Lujan, 931 F.”
United States v. Denezpi, 979 F.3d 777 (10th Cir. 2020). “See 25 C.F.R. § 11.100 et. seq. 4 district court denied the motion.”
Seneca Tel. Co. v. Miami Tribe of Oklahoma, 2011 OK 15 (Okla. 2011). “See 25 C.F.R. §§ 11.100 , 11.102. Tort matters on non-trust "fee" lands against the Miami Tribe could be filed in the Miami Nation Court which was established in 2007.”
Auto Owners Ins. v. Saunooke, 54 F. Supp. 2d 585 (W.D.N.C. 1999). “25 C.F.R. § 11.100 (a)(8). As a result, that court is, at least to some extent, bound by regulations enacted by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.”
Kaw Nation v. Norton, 405 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “Part 1000; or required emergency reassumption of judicial jurisdiction, governed under 25 C.F.R. § 11.100 (c); or was subject to both regulatory regimes.”
Pounds v. Dep't of Interior, 9 F. App'x 820 (10th Cir. 2001). “25 C.F.R. §§ 11.100 ; see Tillett v. Lujan, 931 F.”
In the Matter of the Guardianship of K.D.B., 2025 OK 10 (Okla. 2025). “25 C.F.R. § 11.100 . On December 17, 2003, the Memorandum of Agreement for the Chickasaw Nation to assume primary responsibility for the operation of the Chickasaw Agency Court of Indian Offenses "CFR Court" was agreed to and signed by Bill Anoatubby, Governor of the Chickasaw…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.