C.F.R. » Title 25 » CHAPTER I—BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER B—LAW AND ORDER › PART 11—COURTS OF INDIAN OFFENSES AND LAW AND ORDER CODE › Subpart A—Application; Jurisdiction

25 C.F.R. § 11.100

Where are Courts of Indian Offenses established?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A list of the areas in Indian Country where Courts of Indian Offenses are established is available on the Bureau of Indian Affairs website (www.bia.gov) and is published periodically in the Federal Register.

(b) The Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, will maintain on the Bureau of Indian Affairs website (www.bia.gov) an updated list of the areas in Indian Country where Courts of Indian Offenses are established and, upon any change to the list, will publish notice of the change in the Federal Register with an updated complete list.

[85 FR 646, Jan. 7, 2020]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Comanche Nation v. Fox, 128 S.W.3d 745 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Comanche Nation v. Fox, 128 S.W.3d 745 (Tex. App.—Austin 2004). · cites it 2× “577, 587-89 (2000); see 25 C.F.R. §§ 11.100 et seq. (2003). They were established in the late nineteenth century as part of the BIA's policy to assimilate the Indians into mainstream American society.”
Gary C'hair v. Dist. Court of the Ninth Jud. Dist., 2015 WY 116, 357 P.3d 723. · cites it 2× “See 25 C.F.R. § 11.100 . A Court of Indian Offenses operates only in those areas where a tribal court has not been established.”
Turner ex rel. Kiowa Tribe v. McGee, 681 F.3d 1215 (10th Cir. 2012). “The Court of Indian Offenses is created and empowered by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to 25 C.F.R. § 11.100 et seq. See Tillett v.”
Calvello v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, 1998 S.D. 107, 584 N.W.2d 108. · cites it 2× “We make this assumption because the Yankton Sioux Tribe is no longer listed under 25 C.F.R. § 11.100 (a). See Whiteco Metrocom v.”
Whiteco Metrocom Div. of Whiteco Indus., Inc. v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, 902 F. Supp. 199 (D.S.D. 1995). · cites it 2× “has received a valid tribal enactment identifying the effective date of the code’s implementation, and the name of the tribe has been deleted from the listing of Courts of Indian Offenses under § 11.”
Michael Minnis & Assocs., P.C. v. Kaw Nation, 2004 OK CIV APP 36, 90 P.3d 1009. “25 C.F.R. §§ 11.100 ; see Tillett v. Lujan, 931 F.”
United States v. Denezpi, 979 F.3d 777 (10th Cir. 2020). “See 25 C.F.R. § 11.100 et. seq. 4 district court denied the motion.”
Seneca Tel. Co. v. Miami Tribe of Oklahoma, 2011 OK 15, 253 P.3d 53. “See 25 C.F.R. §§ 11.100 , 11.102. Tort matters on non-trust "fee" lands against the Miami Tribe could be filed in the Miami Nation Court which was established in 2007.”
Auto Owners Ins. v. Saunooke, 54 F. Supp. 2d 585 (W.D.N.C. 1999). · cites it 3× “25 C.F.R. § 11.100 (a)(8). As a result, that court is, at least to some extent, bound by regulations enacted by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.”
Kaw Nation v. Norton, 405 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “Part 1000; or required emergency reassumption of judicial jurisdiction, governed under 25 C.F.R. § 11.100 (c); or was subject to both regulatory regimes.”
Pounds v. Dep't of Interior, 9 F. App'x 820 (10th Cir. 2001). “25 C.F.R. §§ 11.100 ; see Tillett v. Lujan, 931 F.”
In the Matter of the Guardianship of K.D.B., 2025 OK 10, 564 P.3d 83. “25 C.F.R. § 11.100 . On December 17, 2003, the Memorandum of Agreement for the Chickasaw Nation to assume primary responsibility for the operation of the Chickasaw Agency Court of Indian Offenses "CFR Court" was agreed to and signed by Bill Anoatubby, Governor of the Chickasaw…”
Show all 17 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.