25 C.F.R. § 11.411

Criminal trespass

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A person commits an offense if, knowing that he or she is not licensed or privileged to do so, he or she enters or surreptitiously remains in any building or occupied structure. An offense under this subsection is a misdemeanor if it is committed in a dwelling at night. Otherwise it is a petty misdemeanor.

(b) A person commits an offense if, knowing that he or she is not licensed or privileged to do so, he or she enters or remains in any place as to which notice against trespass is given by:

(1) Actual communication to the actor; or

(2) Posting in a manner prescribed by law or reasonably likely to come to the attention of intruders; or

(3) Fencing or other enclosure manifestly designed to exclude intruders.

(c) An offense under this section constitutes a petty misdemeanor if the offender defies an order to leave personally communicated to him or her by the owner of the premises or other authorized person. Otherwise it is a violation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2018–2024 · leading case: Sandvig v. Sessions, 315 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
Sandvig v. Sessions, 315 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “Code § 22-3302 ; 25 C.F.R. § 11.411 , and laws against misappropriation of trade secrets, see 18 U.”
Perez v. San Diego Cnty. (S.D. Cal. 2021). · cites it 3× “He has also asserted claims against 3 unspecified defendants for false arrest; failure to intervene; unlawful trespass pursuant to 4 25 CFR § 11.411 and California Penal Code section 602.”
Sandvig v. Sessions (D.D.C. 2018). “Code § 22–3302; 25 C.F.R. § 11.411 , and laws against misappropriation of trade secrets, see 18 U.”
Brightbey v. Wayne Cnty. Treasurer (E.D. Mich. 2023). “Finally, Plaintiff’s claim for criminal trespass under 25 C.F.R § 11.411 is DISMISSED. Individuals do not file criminal charges in U.”
Sewell v. Hanover Borough Police Dep't (M.D. Penn. 2024). “§ 1421b; (9) 25 C.F.R. § 11.411 . Id. at 1 . Sewell seeks $1,000,000 in damages and that Officer Lloyd “be found guilty of” violating Sewell’s civil rights.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.