25 C.F.R. § 151.1
What is the purpose of this part?
This part sets forth the authorities, policies, and procedures governing the acquisition of land by the United States in trust status for individual Indians and Tribes. This part does not cover acquisition of land by individual Indians and Tribes in fee simple status even though such land may, by operation of law, be held in restricted status following acquisition; acquisition of land mandated by Federal law; acquisition of land in trust status by inheritance or escheat; or transfers of land into restricted fee status unless required by Federal law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases, 1959–2019 · leading case: Akiachak Native Cmty. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 827 F.3d 100 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
Akiachak Native Cmty. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 827 F.3d 100 (D.C. Cir. 2016). “See 25 C.F.R. § 151.1 (1980) (establishing that the Department of Interior’s land-into-trust regulations “do not cover the acquisition of land in trust status in the State of Alaska, except acquisitions for” one tribe lacking aboriginal claims).”
Akiachak Native Cmty. v. United States Dep't of Interior, 995 F. Supp. 2d 7 (D.D.C. 2014). “INTRODUCTION This case involved a challenge by certain Alaskan Native Tribes (“Tribes”) to a regulation promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior (“Secretary”) regarding taking land into trust on behalf of all Indian Tribes,' 25 C.F.R. § 151.1 , pursuant to section 5 of the…”
Akiachak Native Cmty. v. United States Dep't of Interior, 935 F. Supp. 2d 195 (D.D.C. 2013). “” 25 C.F.R. § 151.1 . The plaintiffs argue that this exclusion of Alaska Natives — and only Alaska Natives — from the land-into-trust application process is void under 25 U.”
Akiachak Native Cmty. v. Dep't of the Interior, 584 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2008). “See 25 C.F.R. § 151.1 . Section 151.1 states that the “regulations do not cover the acquisition of land in trust status in the State of Alaska, except acquisitions for the Met-lakatla Indian Community of the Annette Island Reserve or its members.”
Akiachak Native Cmty. v. Dep't of the Interior, 502 F. Supp. 2d 64 (D.D.C. 2007). “25 C.F.R. Part 151.1 states that "[t]hese regulations do not cover the acquisition of land in trust status in the State of Alaska, except acquisitions for the Metlakatla Indian Community of the Annette Island Reserve or its members.”
Sac & Fox Nation of Missouri v. Norton, 240 F.3d 1250 (10th Cir. 2001). “§ 465 , and regulations, 25 C.F.R. §§ 151.1 et seq., and to exercise his discretion as required by law in processing any trust application” filed by Wyandotte Tribe pursuant to Pub.”
Akiachak Native Cmty. v. United States Dep't of Interior, 995 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2013). “§ 465 , which “do not cover the acquisition of land in trust status in the State of Alaska, except acquisitions for the Metlakatla Indian Community of the Annette Island Reserve or it[s] members,” 25 C.F.R. § 151.1 thereby violate the anti-discrimination provision codified at 25…”
Friends of Sierra R.R. v. Tuolumne Park & Rec. Dist., 37 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20041 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007). “(See 25 C.F.R. § 151.1 et seq. (2006).) This, FSR argues, would mean the land could no longer be regulated by state and local authorities.”
Stockbridge-Munsee Cmty. v. United States, 593 F. Supp. 2d 44 (D.D.C. 2009). “BACKGROUND The United States can acquire and take land into trust for the benefit of individual Indians and tribes, pursuant to “the authorities, policy, and procedures” of 25 C.F.R. § 151.1 . Interior, the agency empowered to take lands into trust under the regulations, must…”
Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Vill. of Union Springs, 317 F. Supp. 2d 128 (N.D.N.Y. 2004). “25 C.F.R. § 151.1 (2003). Defendants point out that there are no procedures in place for the BIA to determine whether land purchased in fee simple by a tribe is held in restricted status.”
Sac & Fox Nation of Missouri v. Babbitt, 92 F. Supp. 2d 1124 (D. Kan. 2000). “§ 465 , and regulations, 25 C.F.R. § 151.1 et seq., and to exercise his discretion as required by law in processing any trust application by the Wyandotte of Oklahoma.”
South Dakota v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 314 F. Supp. 2d 935 (D.S.D. 2004). “” The relevant section of these regulations is 25 C.F.R. § 151.11 , which deals with off-reservation acquisitions of land.”
— 25 C.F.R. § 151.1(j) — 1 case
Hamilton v. Macdonald, 503 F.2d 1138 (9th Cir. 1974).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.