25 C.F.R. § 16.7
Performance of Federal functions by successor State courts
All authority to perform functions relating to Indians of the Five Civilized Tribes which by express provisions of Federal statute had been conferred upon probate or county courts of Oklahoma before such county courts were abolished on January 12, 1969, has since that date been vested in the successor district courts of that State, and all rights of litigants continue undiminished in the successor forum, including the right to appeal from adverse decisions rendered therein to the successor appellate court.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1975–1975 · leading case: Nellie Atkins Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apts., Ltd., a Ltd. P'ship, 508 F.2d 518 (10th Cir. 1975).
Nellie Atkins Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apts., Ltd., a Ltd. P'ship, 508 F.2d 518 (10th Cir. 1975). “s protection of the Indian against the excesses of the white man 4 This lack of express right to appeal bolsters our conclusion that the probate division has no authority to entertain an adversary proceeding such as that which Maple Leaf would seek to have it entertain 5 The…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.