25 C.F.R. § 162.601

Fort Belknap Reservation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Not to exceed 20,000 acres of allotted and tribal lands (non-irrigable as well as irrigable) on the Fort Belknap Reservation in Montana may be leased for the culture of sugar beets and other crops in rotation for terms not exceeding ten years.

[66 FR 7109, Jan. 22, 2001. Redesignated at 77 FR 72494, Dec. 5, 2012 and correctly redesignated at 78 FR 27860, May 13, 2013]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2006–2011 · leading case: Grondal v. United States, 682 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (E.D. Wash. 2010).
Grondal v. United States, 682 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (E.D. Wash. 2010). · cites it 3× “The court does not know why such an appearance has not been filed since the United States actually granted the Master Lease (as opposed to simply approving it) on behalf of at least certain landowners pursuant to its authority under 25 C.”
Wapato Heritage, L.L.C. v. United States, 637 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2011). “This regulation is currently found at 25 C.F.R. § 162.601 (2008). 3 . In holding that the Lease is unambiguous, we also reject Wapato's arguments, raised for the first time in its motion for reconsideration, that the Lease is also ambiguous concerning whether the BIA could…”
Wilkinson v. United States, 564 F.3d 927 (8th Cir. 2009). “Pursuant to 25 C.F.R. § 162.601 (a)(3), the BIA does have authority to lease an allotment on behalf of the "undetermined heirs of a decedent’s estate.”
Everglades Ecolodge at Big Cypress, LLC v. Seminole Tribe of Florida, 836 F. Supp. 2d 1296 (S.D. Fla. 2011). “25 C.F.R. § 162.601 . . "rr]he term 'Indian country' .”
Virgil Wilkinson v. United States, 440 F.3d 970 (8th Cir. 2006). · cites it 2× “2 (1998), as cited by the Interior Board, remains unchanged but was moved to 25 C.F.R. § 162.601 (2005). See 66 Fed.Reg.”
Virgil Wilkinson, etc. v. United States (8th Cir. 2009). “3 Pursuant to 25 C.F.R. § 162.601 (a)(3), the BIA does have authority to lease an allotment on behalf of the “undetermined heirs of a decedent’s estate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.