25 C.F.R. § 170.1
What does this part do?
This part provides rules and references to the statutory funding formula for the Department of the Interior (DOI), in cooperation with the Department of Transportation (DOT), to implement the Tribal Transportation Program (TTP). Included in this part are references to other title 23 and title 25 transportation programs administered by the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) and the Secretary of Transportation (together, the “Secretaries”) and implemented by Tribes and Consortiums in accordance with the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975 (ISDEAA), as amended, FHWA program agreements, and other appropriate agreements.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1997–2002 · leading case: State v. Blaze Const. Co., Inc., 947 P.2d 836 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Blaze Const. Co., Inc., 947 P.2d 836 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997). “Indeed, contends Blaze, the BIA road regulations are the same ones on which the Supreme Court in White Mountain held that Arizona’s motor vehicle fuel and use fuel taxes were federally pre-empted.”
McDonald v. Means, 309 F.3d 530 (9th Cir. 2002). “Title 25, Part 170 of the Code of Federal Regulations (“Roads of the Bureau of Indian Affairs”) makes clear that a BIA road is considered an “Indian reservation road,” 25 C.F.R. § 170.1 . This is so even where a road serves both Indian and non-Indian land, see id.”
McDonald v. Means, 300 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir. 2002). “Title 25, Part 170 of the Code of Federal Regulations (“Roads of the Bureau of Indian Affairs”) makes clear that a BIA road is considered an “Indian reservation road,” 25 C.F.R. § 170.1 . This is so even where a road serves both Indian and non-Indian land, see id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.