Any Indian tribe entitled to notice pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 1912 may designate by resolution, or by such other form as the tribe's constitution or current practice requires, an agent for service of notice other than the tribal chairman and send a copy of the designation to the Secretary or his/her designee. The Secretary or his/her designee shall update and publish as necessary the names and addresses of the designated agents in the Federal Register. A current listing of such agents shall be available through the area offices.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
13
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2021 · leading case:
In Re Alice M., 161 Cal. App. 4th 1189 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008).
In Re Alice M., 161 Cal. App. 4th 1189 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008).
“(a)(2); see also 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 [designated agents and addresses are published in the Federal Register].”
In Re Interest of Dakota L., 712 N.W.2d 583 (Neb. Ct. App. 2006).
“See 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 (2005). The names and addresses of the designated agents are published in the Federal Register.”
In Re Edward H., 100 Cal. App. 4th 1 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002).
“( 25 C.F.R., § 23.12 ["Any Indian tribe ...”
In Re Ew, 170 Cal. App. 4th 396 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009).
“( 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 (2008).) A list of the designated agents and their addresses is published annually by the BIA.”
In re E.W. v. V.P., 170 Cal. App. 4th 396 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009).
“( 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 (2008).) A list of the designated agents and their addresses is published annually by the BIA.”
Matter of DS, 577 N.E.2d 572 (Ind. 1991).
“25 C.F.R. § 23.12 . In the case before us, it does not appear that the trial court followed federal law.”
In Re A.K. ca1/5, No. A147327 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 23, 2016).
“4th 1189, 1201 ; 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 (2007).) At the time the ICWA notice in this case was sent in 2015, the designated tribal agents were identified at 79 Fed.”
In Re I.E. ca2/6, No. B310507 (Cal. Ct. App. July 21, 2021).
“( 25 C.F.R. §§ 23.12 , 23.105(a) (2020).) 9 Notice to the San Carlos Apache Tribe was correctly addressed and was acknowledged in a return receipt and a letter stating that there was no evidence the parents or children were enrolled or eligible for enrollment.”
In Re S.J. ca2/1, No. B253138 (Cal. Ct. App. July 25, 2014).
“( 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 ; In re J.T. (2007) 154 Cal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.