25 C.F.R. § 23.12
Designated tribal agent for service of notice
Any Indian tribe entitled to notice pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 1912 may designate by resolution, or by such other form as the tribe's constitution or current practice requires, an agent for service of notice other than the tribal chairman and send a copy of the designation to the Secretary or his/her designee. The Secretary or his/her designee shall update and publish as necessary the names and addresses of the designated agents in the
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2021 · leading case: In Re Alice M., 74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 863 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008).
In Re Alice M., 74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 863 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008). “(a)(2); see also 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 [designated agents and addresses are published in the Federal Register].”
Nicole K. v. Superior Court, 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 443 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007). “( 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 (2006); see 71 Fed.Reg.”
In Re Interest of Dakota L., 712 N.W.2d 583 (Neb. Ct. App. 2006). “See 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 (2005). The names and addresses of the designated agents are published in the Federal Register.”
In Re Edward H., 122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 242 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002). “( 25 C.F.R., § 23.12 ["Any Indian tribe ...”
In Re Ew, 170 Cal. App. 4th 396 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009). “( 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 (2008).) A list of the designated agents and their addresses is published annually by the BIA.”
In re E.W. v. V.P., 170 Cal. App. 4th 396 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009). “( 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 (2008).) A list of the designated agents and their addresses is published annually by the BIA.”
Stanislaus Cnty. Cmty. Servs. Agency v. Cynthia E., 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6294 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002). “( 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 (2001) [“Any Indian tribe .”
Monterey Cnty. Dep't of Soc. & Emp. Servs. v. Tammy L., 161 Cal. App. 4th 1189 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008). “(a)(2); see also 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 (2007) [designated agents and addresses are published in the Federal Register].”
Matter of DS, 577 N.E.2d 572 (Ind. 1991). “25 C.F.R. § 23.12 . In the case before us, it does not appear that the trial court followed federal law.”
In Re A.K. ca1/5 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “4th 1189, 1201 ; 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 (2007).) At the time the ICWA notice in this case was sent in 2015, the designated tribal agents were identified at 79 Fed.”
In Re I.E. ca2/6 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021). “( 25 C.F.R. §§ 23.12 , 23.105(a) (2020).) 9 Notice to the San Carlos Apache Tribe was correctly addressed and was acknowledged in a return receipt and a letter stating that there was no evidence the parents or children were enrolled or eligible for enrollment.”
In Re S.J. ca2/1 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014). “( 25 C.F.R. § 23.12 ; In re J.T. (2007) 154 Cal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.