25 C.F.R. § 23.133
Should courts allow participation by alternative methods?
If it possesses the capability, the court should allow alternative methods of participation in State-court child-custody proceedings involving an Indian child, such as participation by telephone, videoconferencing, or other methods.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2018–2018 · leading case: Mo. Div. of Soc. Servs. v. B.S. (In re Interest of B.L.L.S.), 557 S.W.3d 486 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).
Mo. Div. of Soc. Servs. v. B.S. (In re Interest of B.L.L.S.), 557 S.W.3d 486 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018). “]" Point 2 Parents' second point claims "the trial court erred in conducting the October 20, 2017 trial for the termination of the [Parents'] parental rights, in that the court did not allow [Parents] to at least appear by phone for the trial in accordance with 25 CFR § 23.133…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.