25 C.F.R. § 23.133
Should courts allow participation by alternative methods?
If it possesses the capability, the court should allow alternative methods of participation in State-court child-custody proceedings involving an Indian child, such as participation by telephone, videoconferencing, or other methods.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2018–2018 · leading case: Mo. Div. of Soc. Servs., Child.'s Div. v. B.S. (In re Interest of B.L.L.S.), 557 S.W.3d 486 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).
Mo. Div. of Soc. Servs., Child.'s Div. v. B.S. (In re Interest of B.L.L.S.), 557 S.W.3d 486 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018). “]" Point 2 Parents' second point claims "the trial court erred in conducting the October 20, 2017 trial for the termination of the [Parents'] parental rights, in that the court did not allow [Parents] to at least appear by phone for the trial in accordance with 25 CFR § 23.133…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.