25 C.F.R. § 292.19

How will the Regional Director conduct the consultation process?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Regional Director will send a letter that meets the requirements in § 292.20 and that solicits comments within a 60-day period from:

(1) Appropriate State and local officials; and

(2) Officials of nearby Indian tribes.

(b) Upon written request, the Regional Director may extend the 60-day comment period for an additional 30 days.

(c) After the close of the consultation period, the Regional Director must:

(1) Provide a copy of all comments received during the consultation process to the applicant tribe; and

(2) Allow the tribe to address or resolve any issues raised in the comments.

(d) The applicant tribe must submit written responses, if any, to the Regional Director within 60 days of receipt of the consultation comments.

(e) On written request from the applicant tribe, the Regional Director may extend the 60-day comment period in paragraph (d) of this section for an additional 30 days.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2016–2016 · leading case: Stand up for California v. State of Cal., 6 Cal. App. 5th 686 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016).
Stand up for California v. State of Cal., 6 Cal. App. 5th 686 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “( 25 C.F.R. §§ 292.19 [letter and comment period], 292.”
Stand Up for California! v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior (D.D.C. 2016). · cites it 4× “Indeed, before the Picayune Tribe even submitted its petition, the BIA provided to the Picayune Tribe, on January 23, 2009, a courtesy copy of the consultation letter it was required to send to “[a]ppropriate State and local officials” and “[o]fficials of nearby Indian tribes”…”
Stand Up for California! v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior (D.D.C. 2016). · cites it 4× “Indeed, before the Picayune Tribe even submitted its petition, the BIA provided to the Picayune Tribe, on January 23, 2009, a courtesy copy of the consultation letter it was required to send to “[a]ppropriate State and local officials” and “[o]fficials of nearby Indian tribes”…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.