25 C.F.R. § 32.1

Purpose and scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of this part is to state the policies to be followed by all schools and education programs under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Contract schools operated by Indian Tribes or Alaska Native entities may develop their independent policies, consistent with contractual obligations, or adhere to these. The adherence to the appropriate policies shall reflect the best interests of the student, the Federal government, the Tribes and Alaska Native entities, and shall be based on educationally sound judgment.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1972–1986 · leading case: St. Paul Intertribal Hous. Bd. v. Reynolds, 564 F. Supp. 1408 (D. Minn. 1983).
St. Paul Intertribal Hous. Bd. v. Reynolds, 564 F. Supp. 1408 (D. Minn. 1983). “The Board also cites other cases and programs under which benefits were extended to individuals, including scholarship programs under 25 C.F.R. § 32.1 and loans for economic development under 25 C.”
Vialpando v. State, 640 P.2d 77 (Wyo. 1982). · cites it 2× “See, e.g., 25 U.S.C. § 345 (1970) (for allotment purposes, any person "in whole or in part of Indian blood or descent" included); id.”
Diane Zarr v. Earl Barlow, 800 F.2d 1484 (9th Cir. 1986). “13,327 (1982) ( 25 C.F.R. § 32.1 redesignated section 40.”
Ramon Ruiz v. Rogers C. B. Morton, 462 F.2d 818 (9th Cir. 1972). “25 C.F.R. § 32.1 . . 66 Bureau of Indian Affairs Manual 3.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.