25 C.F.R. § 32.1
Purpose and scope
The purpose of this part is to state the policies to be followed by all schools and education programs under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Contract schools operated by Indian Tribes or Alaska Native entities may develop their independent policies, consistent with contractual obligations, or adhere to these. The adherence to the appropriate policies shall reflect the best interests of the student, the Federal government, the Tribes and Alaska Native entities, and shall be based on educationally sound judgment.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1972–1986 · leading case: St. Paul Intertribal Hous. Bd. v. Reynolds, 564 F. Supp. 1408 (D. Minnesota 1983).
St. Paul Intertribal Hous. Bd. v. Reynolds, 564 F. Supp. 1408 (D. Minnesota 1983). “The Board also cites other cases and programs under which benefits were extended to individuals, including scholarship programs under 25 C.F.R. § 32.1 and loans for economic development under 25 C.”
Vialpando v. State, 640 P.2d 77 (Wyo. 1982). “See, e.g., 25 U.S.C. § 345 (1970) (for allotment purposes, any person "in whole or in part of Indian blood or descent" included); id.”
Diane Zarr v. Earl Barlow, Dir., Off. of Indian Educ. Programs, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 800 F.2d 1484 (9th Cir. 1986). “13,327 (1982) ( 25 C.F.R. § 32.1 redesignated section 40.”
Ramon Ruiz & Anita Ruiz v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Sec'y of the Interior, 462 F.2d 818 (9th Cir. 1972). “25 C.F.R. § 32.1 . . 66 Bureau of Indian Affairs Manual 3.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.