C.F.R. » Title 25 » CHAPTER I—BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER F—TRIBAL GOVERNMENT › PART 83—PROCEDURES FOR FEDERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDIAN TRIBES › Subpart A—General Provisions

25 C.F.R. § 83.5

How does a petitioner obtain Federal acknowledgment under this part?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

To be acknowledged as a federally recognized Indian tribe under this part, a petitioner must meet the Indian Entity Identification (§ 83.11(a)), Governing Document (§ 83.11(d)), Descent (§ 83.11(e)), Unique Membership (§ 83.11(f)), and Congressional Termination (§ 83.11(g)) Criteria and must:

(a) Demonstrate previous Federal acknowledgment under § 83.12(a) and meet the criteria in § 83.12(b); or

(b) Meet the Community (§ 83.11(b)) and Political Authority (§ 83.11(c)) Criteria.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1987–2022 · leading case: Agua Caliente Tribe of Cupeno v. Tara Katuk Mac Lean Sweeney, 932 F.3d 1207 (9th Cir. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Agua Caliente Tribe of Cupeno v. Tara Katuk Mac Lean Sweeney, 932 F.3d 1207 (9th Cir. 2019). “25 C.F.R. § 83.5 . Interior reviews a Part 83 petition for recognition to determine whether the tribe can meet a list of criteria: (a) the group has been identified from historical times to the present, on a substantially continuous basis, as Indian; (b) “a predominant portion…”
Frank B. James v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 824 F.2d 1132 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “See 25 C.F.R. §§ 83.5 , 83.-7. Pursuant to these procedures, the Tribal Council filed with the Department of the Interior a petition for federal acknowledg-.”
United States v. Damien Zepeda, 705 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “See 25 C.F.R. § 83.5 (a) (list to be updated and published every three years).”
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Norton, 389 F.3d 1074 (10th Cir. 2004). “§§ 479a(3), 479a-l; 25 C.F.R. § 83.5 (a). The Delawares had never been on the list prior to this lawsuit.”
Big Sandy Rancheria Enters. v. Rob Bonta, 1 F.4th 710 (9th Cir. 2021). “§ 5131 ; see also 25 C.F.R. §§ 83.5 , 83.11. 22 BIG SANDY RANCHERIA ENTERS.”
Robinson v. Salazar, 885 F. Supp. 2d 1002 (E.D. Cal. 2012). “§§ 479a(3), 479a-l; 25 C.F.R. § 83.5 (a). The 1994 revised regulations, establish modified criteria for petitioning tribes that can provide substantial evidence .”
Richmond v. Wampanoag Tribal Court Cases, 431 F. Supp. 2d 1159 (D. Utah 2006). “§§ 479a(3), 479a-l; 25 C.F.R. § 83.5 (a). Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v.”
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Babbitt, 117 F.3d 1489 (D.C. Cir. 1997). “Although Part 83 regulations require that the list be published no less frequently than every three years, 25 C.F.R. § 83.5 (a) (1996), the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994, 25 U.”
State v. White, 556 S.W.3d 110 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018). “§§ 479a(3), 479a-1 ; 25 C.F.R. § 83.5 (a). Cherokee Nation of Okla.”
Tsi Akim Maidu of Taylorsville Rancheria v. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, No. 2:17-cv-01156 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 13, 2021). “(citing 25 C.F.R. § 83.5 ). 27 28 1 Even if the good cause standard is met under Rule 16(b), the Court has the discretion to 2 refuse amendment if it finds reasons to deny leave to amend under Rule 15(a).”
Tsi Akim Maidu of Taylorsville Rancheria v. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, No. 2:17-cv-01156 (E.D. Cal. July 19, 2022). “) Defendants filed the instant motion to dismiss based on lack of jurisdiction on 24 January 13, 2022.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.