25 C.F.R. § 900.74

How may an Indian tribe or tribal organization propose a lease to be compensated for the use of facilities?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

There are three options available:

(a) The lease may be based on fair market rental.

(b) The lease may be based on a combination of fair market rental and paragraphs (a) through (h) of § 900.70, provided that no element of expense is duplicated in fair market rental.

(c) The lease may be based on paragraphs (a) through (h) of § 900.70 only.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2025 · leading case: Maniilaq Ass'n v. Burwell, 170 F. Supp. 3d 243 (D.D.C. 2016).
Maniilaq Ass'n v. Burwell, 170 F. Supp. 3d 243 (D.D.C. 2016). · cites it 3× “25 C.F.R. § 900.74 . Manii-laq chose option two for its Kivalina clinic lease, submitting a list of the allowable cost elements with a corresponding funding request for each.”
Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians v. HHS (D.C. Cir. 2025). · cites it 2× “” 25 C.F.R. § 900.74 (emphasis added). B Several hundred years ago, the Ojibwe and the Dakota fought for an area around Red Lake in Northwest Minnesota.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.