27 C.F.R. § 7.23
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1993–2019 · leading case: O'Hara v. Diageo-Guinness, USA, Inc., 306 F. Supp. 3d 441 (D.D.C. 2018).
O'Hara v. Diageo-Guinness, USA, Inc., 306 F. Supp. 3d 441 (D.D.C. 2018). “Indeed, as explained earlier, federal and state regulations, designed to protect consumers, prohibit false statements on a malt beverage's label concerning the product's "origin," and thus recognizes that misrepresentations about a product's provenance can influence consumers'…”
Hornell Brewing Co., Inc. v. Brady, 819 F. Supp. 1227 (E.D.N.Y 1993). “According to BATF regulations, malt beverage labels shall not contain any statement that is false or untrue in any particular, or that tends to create a misleading impression, any statement, design, device or representation of or relating to analyses, standards or tests which…”
O'Hara v. Diageo-Guinness, USA, Inc., 370 F. Supp. 3d 204 (D.D.C. 2019). “27 C.F.R. § 7.23 (b) (emphasis added). As the reference to "in association with other printed or graphic matter" indicates, the regulations apply to "any carton, case, or other covering of the container.”
— 27 C.F.R. § 7.23(a) — 1 case
Hornell Brewing Co., Inc. v. Brady, 819 F. Supp. 1227 (E.D.N.Y 1993). “According to BATF regulations, malt beverage labels shall not contain any statement that is false or untrue in any particular, or that tends to create a misleading impression, any statement, design, device or representation of or relating to analyses, standards or tests which…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.