28 C.F.R. § 0.35
General functions; delegation of authority
Under the general supervision of the Attorney General and the direction of the Deputy Attorney General, the following-described matters are assigned to, and shall be conducted, handled or supervised by, the Pardon Attorney but subject to the limitation contained in § 0.36 of this chapter.
(a) Exercise of the powers and performance of the functions vested in the Attorney General by §§ 1.1 through 1.8 inclusive of this chapter.
(b) Performance of such other duties as may be assigned by the Attorney General or the Deputy Attorney General.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1973–2006 · leading case: Jud. Watch, Inc. v. Dep't of Just., 365 F.3d 1108 (D.C. Cir. 2004).
Jud. Watch, Inc. v. Dep't of Just., 365 F.3d 1108 (D.C. Cir. 2004). “The declarations and attachments filed by the Department in the district court reveal that the Attorney General has delegated his advisory duties on pardons *1120 to the Deputy Attorney General, and within the Department, the Pardon Attorney assists the Deputy Attorney General…”
Malone v. Shyne, 937 So. 2d 343 (La. 2006). “A pardon attorney within the Department of Justice of the United States, subject to the general supervision of the Attorney General, has charge of the receipt, investigation, and disposition of applications to the President for pardon.”
Hoffa v. Saxbe, 378 F. Supp. 1221 (D.D.C. 1974). “” The petitions for commutation were received by Lawrence Traylor, the Pardon Attorney of the Department of Justice, pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 0.35 . Thereafter and prior to December 23, 1971, the Pardon Attorney prepared a recommendation that plaintiff’s application for…”
State v. Baxter, 357 So. 2d 271 (La. 1978). “28 CFR, § 0.35 (1976). The power of the Governor of Louisiana to pardon is limited to offenses against the State.”
Michael Alan Crooker v. Off. of the Pardon Attorney & U. S. Dep't of Just., 614 F.2d 825 (2d Cir. 1980). “” 28 C.F.R. § 0.35 . As a unit within an executive department, the Office is subject to the FOIA.”
Melvin v. Laird, 365 F. Supp. 511 (E.D.N.Y 1973). “CONCLUSION There are suggestions in the record that plaintiff, a black officer, was not treated by his white commanding officer with the understanding afforded other officers, that his acts were in part explicable by personal problems and his severely unsettling experiences…”
Binion v. United States Dep't of Just., 695 F.2d 1189 (9th Cir. 1983). “28 C.F.R. §§ 0.35 -.36, 1.1 — 1.7. In investigating these applications, the Pardon Attorney may use reports or services of other agencies, including the FBI.”
United States v. Doe, 957 F. Supp. 1244 (M.D. Fla. 1997). “) and 28 CFR 0.35 and 0.36. (relating to the authority of the Pardon Attorney).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.