C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER I—NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD › PART 102—RULES AND REGULATIONS, SERIES 8 › Subpart C—Procedure Under Section 10(A) to (I) of the Act for the Prevention of Unfair Labor Practices

29 C.F.R. § 102.50

Hearings before the Board or a Board Member

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Whenever the Board deems it necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Act or to avoid unnecessary costs or delay, it may, at any time, after a complaint has issued pursuant to § 102.15 or § 102.33, order that such complaint and any proceeding which may have been instituted with respect thereto be transferred to and continued before it or any Board Member. The provisions of this subpart, insofar as applicable, govern proceedings before the Board or any Board Member pursuant to this section, and the powers granted to Administrative Law Judges in such provisions will, for the purpose of this section, be reserved to and exercised by the Board or the Board Member who will preside.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1968–2024 · leading case: United Nat. Foods v. NLRB, 66 F.4th 536 (5th Cir. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United Nat. Foods v. NLRB, 66 F.4th 536 (5th Cir. 2023). · cites it 2× “order that [a] complaint and any proceeding which may have been instituted with respect thereto be transferred to and continued before it,” 29 C.F.R. § 102.50 , and the Board stated in its order that it transfers a case whenever it issues a Notice to Show Cause.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Beck Engraving Co., Inc., 522 F.2d 475 (3rd Cir. 1975). “See 29 C.F.R. Section 102.50. 2 . Section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act, as amended, 29 U.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Union Bros., Inc., 403 F.2d 883 (4th Cir. 1968). “33, order that such complaint and any proceeding which may have been instituted with respect thereto be transferred to and continued before it or any member of the Board.”
Lacrescent Constant Care Ctr., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 510 F.2d 1319 (8th Cir. 1975). “1973) is pertinent here: If, after the investigation, the Regional Director recommends certification without a hearing, and the Board finds that the Employer raises no material or substantial issues of fact or law warranting reversal or a hearing, further consideration of an…”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Marinor Inns, Inc., 445 F.2d 538 (5th Cir. 1971). “29 C.F.R. § 102.50 ; NLRB v. Red-More Corp.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Red-More Corp., Retail Clerks' Union Local 899, Local Clerks Int'l Ass'n, Afl-Cio, Intervenor, 418 F.2d 890 (9th Cir. 1969). “50 of its rules and regulations, 29 C.F.R. § 102.50 . After such transfer the Board was entitled to pass upon any motion pending in the proceeding.”
Overstreet v. Lucid USA Inc. (D. Ariz. 2024). · cites it 2× “29 CFR § 102.50 . 28 Even when an ALJ has been assigned to preside, the Board is “free to adopt findings of 1 fact and conclusions of law different from the ALJ’s conclusions.”
Alivio Med. Ctr. v. Abruzzo (N.D. Ill. 2024). “29 CFR §102.50 . Furthermore, even when an ALJ has been assigned to preside, the Board is “free to adopt findings of fact and conclusions of law different from the ALJ’s conclusions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.