29 C.F.R. § 1908.11

Exclusions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A Cooperative Agreement under this part will not restrict in any manner the authority and responsibility of the Assistant Secretary under sections 8, 9, 10, 13, and 17 of the Act, or any corresponding State authority.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1979–1979 · leading case: Marshall v. North Am. Car Co., 476 F. Supp. 698 (M.D. Penn. 1979).
Marshall v. North Am. Car Co., 476 F. Supp. 698 (M.D. Penn. 1979). “See 29 C.F.R. § 1908.11 (b). The determination of whether the warrant issued by the Magistrate in this case is of reasonable scope involves a two-step inquiry, namely whether any employee complaint justifies the issuance of a “wall to wall” inspection warrant and, if not,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.